My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2013 9:45:49 AM
Creation date
8/21/2013 9:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/22/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 22,2013 <br /> Page 10 <br /> looking at the Master Plan to buffer outside of that; but reiterated that they <br /> couldn't connect to properties on the west or north. <br /> Mr. Regan also requested that the City reconsider its overall goals for this area; <br /> while retaining interest in redeveloping into nice properties and eliminating <br /> blight, while creating new jobs and enhancing the City's tax base. Mr. Regan <br /> noted that it took catalysts to accomplish these goals, such as capital. If more <br /> flexible uses were allowed on their property, Mr. Regan advised that they were <br /> prepared to come in with redevelopment plans, since the time was now right in <br /> the development cycle to look at it in earnest. Mr. Regan opined that he thought <br /> his firm could be that catalyst to the east side of the Twin lakes property, an area <br /> that was treading water right now; with his firm on the verge of the right time for <br /> them to look at redevelopment options and to provide some options of interest to <br /> the City as well. <br /> In response to Mayor Roe's question on the types of proposed uses, Mr. Regan re- <br /> sponded that twenty-one (21) acres was a big piece of land, but they would need <br /> to secure anchor tenants, leaning toward heavy commercial use with some retail <br /> piece to anchor and kick-off development. Without knowing the size or scale at <br /> this time, Mr. Regan advised that he did not see their property coming up with a <br /> dense, multi-story mixed use, opining that it didn't make sense at that location. In <br /> response to Mayor Roe, Mr. Regan clarified that he was not limiting that pro- <br /> posed use to retail unless it made sense for that area. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that this had been discussed by the City Council and staff earlier <br /> this year,permitted uses within the overall area or restricting uses in other parts of <br /> the district. Mayor Roe asked Mr. Regan what uses he saw as most compatible to <br /> what was in the area of his property and how it fit with current zoning to facilitate <br /> that type of use. Mayor Roe questioned if Community Mixed Use (CMU) land <br /> use designation made sense. <br /> Mr. Regan noted that his firm invested a lot of costs at the front end without <br /> knowing if a project would succeed or not; and asked that the City keep that in <br /> mind and eliminate uncertainties to the greatest degree possible; suggesting that <br /> the City could do this by taking a more focused approach to the Twin Lakes Mas- <br /> ter Plan. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested, with concurrence of Mr. Regan, that therefore the City <br /> needed to provide as much flexibility in uses as possible, and not proscribe ex- <br /> tremely specific uses on specific parcels,. <br /> Councilmember McGehee sought comment from Mr. Regan on an additional an- <br /> chor retail tenant and increased traffic volumes on County Road C between Snel- <br /> ling and Fairview Avenues when Wal-Mart would already have significant im- <br /> pacts to that roadway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.