CC_Minutes_2013_0722 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 22,2013 Page 9 opment went forward, especially related to existing housing in the area and north of Twin Lakes. Mr. Murphy recognized the enjoyable amenity of being able to walk and bike around the park; and expressed concern with how various types of businesses might affect those amenities going forward, asking that consideration be given for traffic volumes and retaining the walkability of that area, in keeping with the City's vision and comprehensive plan guidance. Dan Regan,Air Lake Development Mr. Regan advised that he represented owners of the twenty-one (21) acre, three (3) parcel area immediately adjacent to the Bylerly's store on County Road C be- tween Fairview and Snelling Avenues. As a family business developer for prop- erties in the Twin Cities for over twenty (20) years (e.g. Air Lake Industrial park in Lakeville, MN and other industrial/retail projects in the metropolitan area) and having owned this property for a long time, Mr. Regan asked that everyone re- member one vital thing. As dialogue opened on the Twin Lakes Master Plan overall, Mr. Regan asked that everyone remember that development is cyclical and, as a developer, he didn't drive development, he was simply a developer; and tenants drove development. Mr. Regan noted that for some time, development had been driven by industrial tenants, but over the last 5-6 years, there had been no interest in that use until recently. During that time, Mr. Regan advised that medical/office had been an interested use. However, Mr. Regan reiterated that planners don't drive development, only the end users and tenants. Mr. Regan suggested a first step may be to take a more focused look at the Twin Lakes Overlay District and determine what makes sense. In Mr. Regan's opinion, the residential cooperative building off Langton Lake was a good example for that specific area. Specific to his company's property, Mr. Regan opined that there were some constraints based on land use options and questioned if their property should be held to the same standard and sue restrictions for land use design stand- ards as the rest of the district. Mr. Regan noted that their property on County Road C was bounded on the west and north up to Terrace Drive by a county ditch as well as a significant topographical change from their property to the west (e.g. Tile Shop, H & W, etc.) with a forty foot (40') drop. Therefore, Mr. Regan ad- vised that there was no possible physical connection available from their property to those properties on Fairview Avenue without a significant engineering feat. Also, noting recent improvements to County Road C with the addition of turn lanes, Mr. Regan noted the limitations of what they could do on their property based on their primary access on County Road C. Based on that situation, Mr. Regan specifically asked that the City consider pull- ing their property out of the Twin Lakes Planning District, allowing them to something more in line with uses to the east. Mr. Regan opined that a senior co- operative development didn't make sense on their property that would look out to truck terminals or a shopping center; and some type of use more in line with the shopping center to the west would be more appropriate. Mr. Regan suggested