CC_Minutes_2013_0722 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 22, 2013 Page 27 could be developed that would keep the levy flat by trimming expenses where possible; recognizing that the debt service was excluded from that proposal. Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, directing staff to return through the City Manager-recommended Budget for 2014 a proposed flat levy. Mayor Roe addressed several additional implications of that direction, including not addressing the Compensation Study recommendation or any additional posi- tions;but directing staff to figure it out and present a proposal accordingly. Councilmember Laliberte confirmed that this was her request; and if the City felt it was a priority to attempt this, they could pass that direction on to staff, based on the priorities tasked to each Department Head. Since there was yet no agreement on a policy for implementing the Compensation Study, Councilmember Laliberte opined that how and when it was funded remained an unknowns. Councilmember Willmus asked Councilmember Laliberte if she was open to a friendly amendment directing staff to present two (2) budgets for City Council consideration: one as proposed in the original motion, and the second to pre- pare a budget at the maximum levy limit allowed, excluding debt service, allow- ing the City Council and public to compare them side by side. Councilmember Laliberte accepted that friendly amendment. Councilmember Laliberte advised that she was willing to consider both, but opined that residents were continually being tapped to the extreme; and given the current level of re- serves, she was willing to have further consideration on the current policy at 35- 45%now and in the future. Friendly Amendment Direct staff to bring forward two (2) budget proposals without an extensive amount of detail: one with a zero levy increase and one with a maximum levy limit, both excluding debt service, with no further clarification and addressing levy impacts only. Interim City Manager Trudgeon clarified that all budgets did not impact property taxes across the board; and sought further direction on whether the direction was exclusive to the property tax supported levy and budget. During last week's budget discussions, Councilmember Laliberte noted that staff had been asked and confirmed that current fee levels were sufficient. Mayor Roe suggested that, based on the levy limit on revenue, that the fee- supported budget be considered frozen as well under that scenario.