My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2013 9:45:49 AM
Creation date
8/21/2013 9:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/22/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 22,2013 <br /> Page 28 <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that his request for further clarification was based on the fact <br /> that while inflationary issues could be addressed easily, if considering as an ex- <br /> ample the Community Development Department budget at a zero percent in- <br /> crease, it also remained frozen at 2013 levels,while not impacted by levy limits as <br /> it was supported primarily through fees. Mr. Trudgeon sought whether all budg- <br /> ets should be frozen at 2013 levels, with associated ramifications, or only those <br /> supported by the property tax levy. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that he would take the motion and direction to <br /> mean levy-focused only. <br /> Regarding staff time to prepare and present two different budget scenarios, Mr. <br /> Trudgeon deferred to Finance Director Miller, allowing time for conversations <br /> and work by Departments Heads in determining their priorities, and for he and <br /> Mr. Miller to get those budget scenarios prepared for presentation to the City <br /> Council by August 19, 2013. Mr. Miller noted that it should be doable. <br /> Based on the current pressures, Councilmember Laliberte added that it was im- <br /> portant to look at the worst case scenario, some of those things that were outside <br /> the control of the City, and stressed the importance of having that information in- <br /> cluded. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified, and Councilmember Laliberte confirmed that her motion did <br /> not include the use of reserves of LGA funds. <br /> If only intended as an exercise, Councilmember Etten opined that he could sup- <br /> port the motion; however, he noted that the $430,000 already excluded an infla- <br /> tionary increase for basic operations and would already represent a zero percent <br /> increase in that portion of the budget, requiring staff to absorb any recommended <br /> Compensation Study increase and identified mandates. Councilmember Etten <br /> cautioned that this scenario at zero percent increase went from making an invest- <br /> ment in City employees to significantly reducing or eliminating a lot of options; <br /> and if seriously considered, needed to be open to using reserve principles or re- <br /> purposing those reserves. Councilmember Etten opined that he did not anticipate <br /> any additional money in reserves by year-end 2012 with the exception of addi- <br /> tional monies available to the City for the budget that were not currently being <br /> talked about. <br /> Mr. Miller concurred, based on current and projected interest rates so low; and <br /> those older investments maturing and needing to be reinvested at those lower in- <br /> terest rates that he projected to remain stagnant at best and possibly declining in <br /> 2014. Mayor Roe concurred, noting that the investment would reduce according- <br /> ly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.