My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2013 9:45:49 AM
Creation date
8/21/2013 9:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/22/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 22, 2013 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 4. Evaluation—Will the City take a look to change after evaluations? <br /> In referencing the map provided in his bench handout, Mr. Foster noted that even <br /> though the area was listed as 210 plus acres, there were essentially only four (4) <br /> parcels; further noting that the parcel identified as "Parcel #8" would receive an <br /> initial hearing for a proposed development later in tonight's meeting. In talking to <br /> the owners/principles of those four(4) parcels, Mr Foster advised that without ex- <br /> ception they were all interested in doing something. Mr. Foster opined that the <br /> location Twin Lakes was superb. <br /> Mr. Foster noted that there were eleven (11) banks within and representing the fi- <br /> nancial community in Roseville; all active and successful; and with enactment of <br /> the Community Reinvestment Act, had that tool available to them and an obliga- <br /> tion to assist businesses and residents in the community. <br /> Mr. Foster further opined that the four(4)parcels were not very big; and suggest- <br /> ed use of the 1033 Tax Deferred Exchange in conjunction with 1031 as another <br /> option, depending on whether or not a property was under threat of condemnation <br /> or if the owner or principle wished to sell using the Tax Deferred Exchange. Mr. <br /> Foster opined that it would take further review by the City Attorney to provide a <br /> legal opinion based on specific properties; but he was of the opinion that such an <br /> option could work to everyone's benefit, and suggested that the City Council con- <br /> sider it as an option to assist and apply in the Twin Lakes area. Mr. Foster ad- <br /> vised that he included a copy of the 1033 law in his packet of handouts. <br /> Mr. Foster referenced another part of his handout that provided a copy of a July <br /> 14, 2013,Minneapolis Star Tribune newspaper article on Shakopee, MN and cor- <br /> porations locating in that community. <br /> Mr. Foster noted that the next two (2) pages of his handout provided information <br /> about the Small Business Administration (SBA) and willingness of U. S. Bank in <br /> assisting the business community with planned expansion, rehabilitation or relo- <br /> cation efforts. <br /> Mr. Foster referenced the remaining information in his handout from the legal <br /> department of the Minnesota League of Cities, opining that it was a great organi- <br /> zation. <br /> Mr. Foster opined that Twin Lakes was not very complicated; and noted that <br /> there was a group of investment bankers from New York that had come to Rose- <br /> ville to look at the Twin Lakes area to determine if it was investment grade prop- <br /> erty. Mr. Ralston opined that they had been very impressed with the Twin Lakes <br /> area due to its location, the Park&Ride amenity already in place, and various res- <br /> idential potential. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.