Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 5 <br />The second item is: Zero Waste Composting Program—Curbs ide Co-Collection of Compostable 103 <br />Material with recyclables (in a separate compartment on the same truck). 104 <br />Ramsey County is mandating that all cities in the county have a progr am for collection of 105 <br />residential compostable material (aka organics) by the end of 2016. Current practice in the metro 106 <br />area is to co-collect organics either in a garb age truck or a recycling truck. Because Roseville 107 <br />does not have organized garbage collection, the City would need to provide for organics 108 <br />collection through the recycling program. A five-y ear contract would run through 2018 thus 109 <br />allowing the program to expand to include collection of organics. 110 <br />Eureka Recycling has asked that if the City is interested in meeting Ramsey County’s mandate 111 <br />that it is willing to negotiate an expansion of the recycling service. In order to co-collect 112 <br />recycling and organics Eureka Recycling woul d need to order split body trucks which have 113 <br />separate compartments – one for recycling, one for organics. The price of split body trucks 114 <br />would be included in the offered price. Howeve r, Eureka Recycling asks that the Council agree 115 <br />now that the City will discuss expansion of the program so that it could be completed by the end 116 <br />of 2016. Both Eureka Recycling and the City agr ee this discussion would not commit the City to 117 <br />actually expanding the recycling progra m to include organics collection. 118 <br />P OLICY O BJECTIVE 119 <br />Meet the Imagine Roseville 2025 go al that Roseville is an envi ronmentally healthy community 120 <br />by providing recycling service for residents. 121 <br />To competitively bid for contracted services. 122 <br />B UDGET I MPLICATIONS 123 <br />The Recycling Program is operated as an enterp rise fund. Income to the fund comes from three 124 <br />sources: resident fees, revenue sh are from the sale of material and an annual SCORE grant of 125 <br />approximately $65,000. Any change in costs associ ated with the program would need to come 126 <br />from increased resident fees. The rates are typically set by th e Council in November. 127 <br />The proposed five year contract option with vendor owned carts is expected to decrease the 128 <br />residential recycling fee to residents approximately 20%. Currently the resi dent recycling fee is 129 <br />$6.00 per quarter and the Finance Director esti mates the new fee will be less than $5.00 per 130 <br />quarter based on preliminary fee analysis. He wi ll do a more detailed analysis on the rate later 131 <br />this year prior to the Council setting 2014 fees. 132 <br />If the Council chooses the city ow ned cart option the cost of the carts would need to be funded 133 <br />with reseves and recovered in th e rate structure over time. 134 <br />S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION 135 <br />Staff recommends the Council authorize staff to ne gotiate a five-year recycling services contract 136 <br />with Eureka Recycling with vendor owned carts. Much of the agreement is already contained in 137 <br />the RFP and the response. 138 <br />Discuss the cart ownership options and financial implications. 139 <br />Authorize staff to conduct discussions with Eu reka Recycling about possibly adding curbside 140 <br />organics collection to the contract at a future date. Both Eureka Recycling and the City agree 141 <br />this discussion would not commit the City to actually expanding the recycling program to 142 <br />include organics collection. 143