2013-07-23_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

At the request of Chair Vanderwall, Ms. Bloom advised that there were no existing easements in place. Chair Vanderwall opined that if there was something already available, and no private property owner was interested in giving up any land, the PWETC or City should not spend time evaluating the options. Chair Vanderwall further opined that, this segment didn't actually provide that much of a shortcut. Member Gjerdingen noted that it would provide an option to avoid County Roads C or B-2; with Chair Vanderwall noting that there was an existing off- road pathway on County Road B-2 that would allow park access. Member Gjerdingen opined that, the existing pathway near the shoreline had a significantly steep grade, and the dirt trail was in bad shape, dissipating into nothing. Ms. Bloom suggested that this discussion be brought to the attention of the Parks & Recreation Commission to determine if it had been brought up during conversations with residents during the Park Renewal process. • #30 Villa Park Connections Ms. Bloom addressed the significant topography challenges, and the steep drop of 30' into Villa Park for this segment. Ms. Bloom questioned what could be accomplished with a pathway connection at this location; and whether the installation of stairs, given the lack of intrusion or erosion concerns as long as ADA accessible, was even an option. With the requirement for switchbacks to meet ADA requirements, Ms. Bloom noted the considerable width would be an issue. Ms. Bloom suggested that this was another area to seek input from the neighborhood to determine the importance for them of a connection, recognizing the need for connectivity to the park. Ms. Bloom suggested that this was another discussion topic for the Parks & Recreation Commission and their discussions with residents during the Park Renewal process. • #2 County Road C-2 (west of Snelling) Ms. Bloom noted that this was a very challenging segment; and noted her various on-road and off-road options. Ms. Bloom noted that each of the options fit with the Park Constellation Plans. Chair Vanderwall noted that the problem was the bridge. Ms. Bloom concurred, noted that demand for this was not as high as for County Road C or the NE Diagonal connection; however, if it could be done, she opined that it would provide great access. Ms. Bloom noted that the County Road C-2 sidewalk between Hamline Ave and Lexington Ave was seeing significant use. • #29 Lovell to Minnesota Street Connection • #27 Heinel Drive Connection Page 8 of 11