CC_Minutes_2013_0819 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,August 19,2013 Page 14 Mr. Miller expressed his caution to make that determination across the board, not- ing that each Department Head reviewed their specific department budget and forecasted based on actual amounts; but offered to provide the information to the best of his ability. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Miller advised that projections given in April of 2013 had proven accurate with the revised market value changes for the community made available just last week from Ramsey County, indicating a 1.3% increase in tax base based on the City's total market value. At the request of Councilmember McGehee for the next discussion, she requested that staff provide information on their recommended increases to business licens- es and fees; as well as how those rates compared to other comparable communi- ties. Councilmember McGehee opined that with the City increasing utility fees in recent years, any additional cost for permit fees amounted to an additional tax on residents; and should be identified accordingly rather than listed as an additional revenue source without recognizing those full implications. Mr. Trudgeon advised that while staff could determine how much fees were antic- ipated to change from 2013 to 2014 as its annual exercise in reviewing the overall fee structure every November, it would take considerable staff time to research comparables with other communities. Mr. Trudgeon advised that he was not try- ing to resist providing that additional information; however, in setting Roseville fees, the determination was based on the costs for performing those services, not comparing to neighboring communities, but attempting to cover the actual costs for the City. Mr. Trudgeon noted that while those comparables didn't factor into the fee structure, it was certainly important for staff to be aware of that infor- mation to remain competitive (e.g. recreational services and programs); however, building permit fees were based on the valuation to cover processing costs. Mr. Trudgeon offered to provide projected as much information on fee recommenda- tions for 2014 by the next meeting, he was not sure if all of the information would be readily available by then. Mayor Roe clarified for Councilmembers that fees supporting the Community Development Department (e.g. building, land use applications, etc.) were budget- ed within the department as anticipated costs and associated fees to cover those costs, adjusted as indicated. However, Mayor Roe noted that none of those fees had any impact on the annual tax levy; with the fees addressed during tonight's presentation including business, pet, court fines and law enforcement costs; and didn't represent a significant amount of revenue in general. Mr. Miller concurred, noting that in the context of the overall General Fund, the City could not legally profit from imparting regulatory fees; and further noted that he didn't expect a lot of relief in those fees.