My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9783
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9700
>
res_9783
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:40:42 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 10:23:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9783
Resolution Title
Resolution Approving a Variance from Section 1004.02D5 (Minimum Yard Requirements) of the Roseville City Code for Property Located at 2125 Dale Street North
Resolution Date Passed
6/12/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 12th day of June 2000, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />Council Member Wiski introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9783 <br /> <br />Resolution Approving a variance from Section 1004.02D5 (Minimum Yard Requirements) <br />of the Roseville City Code for property located at 2125 Dale Street North. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D5 (Minimum Yard requirements) requires principal structures <br />to be set back a minimum distance of 30 feet from property line; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Ken Wieden has requested a variance to allow the construction of a detached <br />two stall garage adjacent to Eldridge Avenue (south side of home) within the required front yard <br />setback; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Ken Wieden has a unique comer lot situation that precludes complete <br />conformance with the Roseville City Code without damaging certain existing conditions of his <br />parcel; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the proposed site improvement would allow safer access to and form the parcel; <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request <br />on Wednesday, May 10,2000, failing (3 - 4) to recommend approval of the variance request; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />a. The hardship situation was not created by the applicant (Wieden) and existed <br />prior to the applicant. .. (existing tree removal and safety issues with driveway <br />access to Dale Street) <br /> <br />b. The unique physical features or situations within the proposal that could justify a <br />variance include safety, topography... (no reasonable place to construct garage <br />except south side of home) <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.