Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes Tuesday, August 13, 2013 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />1 <br />would need to occur during daytime hours when business owners/managers were on site rather <br />2 <br />than during the evening. <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br />Ms. Kelsey suggested opening the task force panel to individual HRA and/or City <br />5 <br />Councilmembers, past policy makers that had been heavily involved in past BR&E efforts, and <br />6 <br />other individuals in the community as identified by the HRA. Ms. Kelsey advised that both <br />7 <br />area Chambers of Commerce had been asked to <br />8 <br />the City in performing the BR&E, but neither wanted to be involved. Ms. Kelsey suggested <br />9 <br />that the HRA consider and engage a broad-based community task force that could include <br />10 <br />other property owners in the community. <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> Ms. Kelsey reviewed the process for the BR&E Task Force that included training for visits to <br />13 <br />businesses by two (2) task force members (a scriber and a questioner) with a lengthy <br />14 <br />questionnaire to ensure 100% consistency and completion of the survey and follow-up <br />15 <br />questions. Ms. Kelsey advised that the survey will probably be provided to businesses prior to <br />16 <br />the actual visit to allow them time to complete a portion, or refer it to other departments within <br />17 <br />the business to provide some of the information. Ms. Kelsey noted that staff would encourage <br />18 <br />keeping a partnership with the Chambers of Commerce, as they already had a good <br />19 <br />relationship with businesses in the community, since the last BR&E performed by the City was <br />20 <br />done in 2004 prior to staff changes/reductions. Ms. Kelsey suggested taking names from the <br />21 <br />initial list of participants in those past studies as a starting point of task force members and <br />22 <br />then expanding that group. <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br />9. Action/Discussion Items <br />25 <br /> <br />26 <br />a. Authorization to work for University of Minnesota Extension BR&E Services <br />27 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that, based on review of the four (4) proposals and the extensive <br />28 <br />29 <br />comprehensive report that will be provided to the HRA, staff recommended entering into a <br />30 <br />contract with the U of MN Extensions BR&E Strategies Program in an amount not to exceed <br />31 <br />32 <br />that based on the quality of the U of MN reporting products, their close proximity to the City <br />33 <br />of Roseville; and capability of meeting and programming elements that addressed Roseville- <br />34 <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />36 <br />In evaluating the low proposal, Ms. Kelsey opined that, while this included work previously <br />37 <br />38 <br />expectations of the efforts needed. <br />39 <br /> <br />40 <br />Chair Maschka referenced the five (5) bullet points under Item E (Budget and Timeline) of the <br />41 <br />U of MN Proposal included in the $9,700 fee. <br />42 <br /> <br />43 <br />Ms. Kelsey confirmed that observation; and advised that staff was in final negotiations with <br />44 <br />Xcel Energy on a contract that would reimburse the HRA in the amount of $2,500.00 of the <br />45 <br />total $9,700 fee. <br />46 <br /> <br />47 <br />Motion: Member Quam moved, seconded by Member Lee to authorize entering into a <br />48 <br />contract for Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) services and reports with the U <br />49 <br />of MN Extension BR&E Program, as detailed in the staff report dated August 13, 2013 <br />50 <br />and Attachment A proposal dated July 17, 2013; at a total cost not to exceed $9,700. <br />51 <br /> <br />52 <br />At the request of Member Masche, Ms. Kelsey confirmed that the U of MN had the ability to <br />53 <br />assist the HRA in implementing items from the report that moved beyond research. Ms. <br />54 <br />Kelsey advised that from the end report, recommendations for programs in the community <br /> <br />