Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 16,2013 <br /> Page 18 <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that since the community was new to the country <br /> and not English-speaking, it was even more important for them to be close geo- <br /> graphically, thus the number living in a unit; and suggested that this was some- <br /> thing for staff to take into consideration. <br /> b. Discuss Twin Lakes Redevelopment <br /> Two additional bench handouts were distributed, , consisting of the District 10 <br /> Land Use District and summary of land use categories from the 2030 Comprehen- <br /> sive Plan adopted October 26, 2009. <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke included a background of discussions and staff <br /> challenges to-date as detailed in the RCA dated September 16, 2013. <br /> Mr. Paschke suggested two (2) discussion areas upon which to focus: <br /> Property Zoning — With most of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area zoned <br /> Community Mixed Use (CMU) or High Density Residential (HDR); and if there <br /> were some areas in the CMU that needed to be removed or other areas to separate <br /> out, specifically the area east of Fairview Avenue <br /> Uses within Twin Lakes — Whether or not retail should be a component, if so <br /> whether its size should be limited; and whether certain Permitted Uses within cur- <br /> rent Tables should be revised, or specific uses that are not of interest to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested, since uses and where they were or were not permitted may <br /> direct zoning, focusing first on the "Uses within Twin Lakes" to define those uses <br /> and their locations. <br /> Discussion included how the Twin Lakes area should be defined geographically, <br /> and how far north or south, and whether it included the area east of Fairview Av- <br /> enue (west of Byerly's strip mall) or whether that area should be rezoned or con- <br /> sidered in the context of Twin Lakes or not. <br /> Discussion specific to that area included what significance there was to make it <br /> part of the Twin Lakes area; of if it should remain zoned Community Mixed Use <br /> (CMU) in accordance with the Regulating Plan, or narrowed further, consistent <br /> with the area north of Terrace Drive guided toward HDR, considering that it abut- <br /> ted HDR even though guided CMU. <br /> Further discussion on current uses in that specific area included management of <br /> the multi-tenant properties based on current uses and their range of uses; and if <br /> zoned HDR how much change could occur or if other uses could be opened if <br /> zoned CMU,but not having definite clarification of what those uses may be. <br /> Whether or not the properties were zoned CMU, Mayor Roe opined that he would <br /> argue what significance there was for including the properties in the Twin Lakes <br />