My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0916
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
9/24/2013 11:26:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 16, 2013 <br /> Page 20 <br /> sists of a restaurant or small store on the first floor and housing above it. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee further opined that she didn't want warehouse distribution <br /> with trucks coming and going, but preferred a use where something was actually <br /> made. Councilmember McGehee stated that she wanted something that provided <br /> good jobs above and beyond the current level of wages offered in Roseville. <br /> Mayor Roe corrected that perception by referencing the CMU designated land use <br /> category, as included as one of the bench handouts. Mayor Roe further stated that <br /> the CMU does not currently allow for a high production use. <br /> Mayor Roe referenced Use Tables, some that were included in the packet materi- <br /> als for the CMU District; noting that artisan or catering uses were currently al- <br /> lowed in Industrial Districts, but neither was on the list of permitted uses for <br /> CMU or Commercial Districts. Mayor Roe advised that those were the types of <br /> uses he wanted to rethink, and opined that warehousing was not part of that con- <br /> sideration. <br /> In polling the Council, Mayor Roe found majority consensus to look at CMU-1 or <br /> CMU-2 to address some of those uses. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon suggested the next step for staff's review of those sections and use <br /> tables, and bring them back for further discussion; opining that it could make a <br /> difference in part of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area than how it was known <br /> today. <br /> There was no consensus at this point as to whether the Byerly's strip mall should <br /> be included within the CMU designation. <br /> After further discussion, Mr. Paschke stated that it was easy to determine which <br /> uses the City Council did not want permitted, noting that the definition was inten- <br /> tionally broad, but that the chart drove what happened within the Twin Lakes <br /> boundaries once assigned and the desired achievement for that area; and those us- <br /> es further defined if included on the chart and design standards created in remain- <br /> ing areas with specific design plans. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that while staff understood there may be specific things not <br /> preferred in other districts (e.g. asphalt plant), it was necessary to understand that <br /> the challenge was the size and impact of a permitted use. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that further discussion was necessary in the area west of the <br /> Byerly's strip mall, agreeing with Councilmember Willmus that a large format re- <br /> tailer would not work in that area; while the City found that it would work at <br /> County Road C and Cleveland Avenue given the easy access to major highways. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that perhaps the CMU-2 guidance was to not include large <br /> impact retail; however, he noted that it needed to be clearly defined and would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.