Laserfiche WebLink
agencies; as well as considering that they needed to show some synthesis with the <br /> City of Roseville's long-term Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Member <br /> DeBenedet reiterated that he ranked his spreadsheet from highest to lowest. <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted that, given the disparity of ranking and various <br /> methodologies used, it caused some projects that he considered a priority to <br /> receive a lower rating. Chair Vanderwall advised that he did not consider some of <br /> those results a favorable conclusion. <br /> Member Stenlund advised that he had looked at what would be his top five <br /> projects, based on numbers from the master spreadsheet, and identified those <br /> pieces he felt could be realistically accomplished with limited funds. While he <br /> admitted that there may be other pieces that needed to be done, Member Stenlund <br /> opined that his approach had been to look at the map to determine which projects <br /> would accomplish the best city-wide flow as the first steps, again recognizing that <br /> all of the projects could not be accomplished. Member Stenlund advised that he <br /> had not understood that the goal was to identify each item with a ranking. <br /> Ms. Bloom clarified her understanding of the directive from the City Council to <br /> the PWETC to create a master build-out plan, which she took to mean everything. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that, once that was developed, it was up to staff and the <br /> PWETC to then develop real numbers and a realistic timeframe over a period of <br /> years to accomplish that plan. Ms. Bloom recognized that some would not make <br /> sense without a road project, as some members of the PWETC had identified, but <br /> still were to be included in the plan with those caveats identified. <br /> Chair Vanderwall admitted that this had initially been a soft target, but provided <br /> better focus; and suggested that individual members take another shot at it, with <br /> each using a consistent methodology. <br /> Member DeBenedet concurred that the PWETC had not yet reached the point <br /> where it could make a recommendation to the City Council; and opined that they <br /> needed to roll their sleeves up again. With the PWETC having come up with so <br /> many ideas, it had made the entire prospect more complicated. <br /> Chair Vanderwall advised that he had included a ranking (from 1 — 6) in each <br /> category a point to be able to with#6 indicating it was a segment he didn't have <br /> any interest in pursuing; and clarified that he didn't look at any segments only on <br /> the basis of whether they could be accomplished realistically. Chair Vanderwall <br /> suggested that the next look consider every single segment or option considered in <br /> relationship with everything listed. Chair Vanderwall opined that tonight's <br /> discussion and hearing the perspective of other members had been beneficial for <br /> him. <br /> Member DeBenedet advised that he had considered the list based on how he <br /> would address it if he was a decision-maker with a certain length of time to build <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br />