My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0923
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0923
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2013 4:04:15 PM
Creation date
10/15/2013 4:04:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/23/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 23, 2013 <br /> Page 9 <br /> the property owner; and if not paid, staff is directed to recover costs as specified <br /> in City Code, Section 407.07B. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: McGehee; Willmus; Laliberte: and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 13. Business Items—Presentations/Discussions <br /> a. Receive Lexington Park Update <br /> A bench handout was provided, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consisting <br /> of a memorandum dated September 20, 2013, from Architects Hagen, Christensen <br /> & Mcllwain, responding to City Council comments and questions at the Septem- <br /> ber 16, 2013 meeting. Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke briefly re- <br /> viewed those responses, and provided an update with specific and general infor- <br /> mation. <br /> As a result of the pre-proposal meeting held last week for contractors to review <br /> the Lexington Park Community Gathering Building, and be introduced to remain- <br /> ing projects coming forward in future Requests for Proposals (RFP's), Mr. <br /> Brokke advised that it had been determined that it may provide for more efficien- <br /> cies and better pricing to hold off on the Lexington Park building as an early de- <br /> livery project and bid it as a package with remaining facilities at a future date. <br /> Mr. Brokke advised that there were approximately twenty-five (25) people attend- <br /> ing the pre-proposal meeting, representing six (6) or seven (7) general contracts, <br /> and other subcontractors interested in providing other amenities and fixtures. <br /> Based on discussions from last week's City Council meeting, and as a result of <br /> the pre-proposal meeting, Mr. Brokke opined that it may be prudent to better un- <br /> derstand systems and specific looks in more detail for proposed buildings, their <br /> components and materials. Mr. Brokke suggested that those details would return <br /> to the City Council at a later date for additional discussion, and a determination <br /> on how future buildings could be interchangeable as design work proceeds, and <br /> possible bid alternates, along with various materials and their related cost esti- <br /> mates. As an example of fiber cement siding, Mr. Brokke displayed a picture of <br /> the Arboretum building. <br /> Councilmember McGehee thanked the architect and Mr. Brokke for providing de- <br /> tailed responses to those items and issues raised by the City Council last week. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that her primary concern was to make sure <br /> things were done right, especially with interchangeable buildings, and to provide <br /> continuity within the park system and possibly match current buildings. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee further opined that she was in favor of whatever steps neces- <br /> sary to reduce overall maintenance in during the life span of the buildings and fa- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.