My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-10-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-10-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2013 3:10:52 PM
Creation date
10/18/2013 2:50:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Roseville Public Works, Environment <br />and Transportation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Tuesday, September 24, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 551 <br />Introduction / Call Roll <br />Vice Chair Stenlund called the meeting to order at approximately 6:30 p.m. <br />Members Present: Vice Chair Dwayne Stenlund; and Members Jim <br />DeBenedet; Steve Gjerdingen; and Joan Felice <br />Members Excused: <br />Staff Present: <br />Chair Jan Vanderwall <br />Publi rks o%Duawartz <br />remove or avoid bottlenecks of those that would require a large CIP <br />expenditure to work. Member Gjerdingen brought up Mr. Stenlund's earlier <br />comment about ranking projects according to what year they should be done <br />and suggested that such ranking would not be relevant, and since some of the <br />streets were already scheduled on the CIP and some not, it would be simpler <br />to base prioritization from #1 — 5 simply on the merits of each segment." <br />Ayes: 4 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />4. Communication Items <br />Public Works Director Schwartz noted that updates on various construction <br />projects were included in tonight's meeting packet and available on -line at the <br />Page 1 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.