My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-10-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-10-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2013 3:10:52 PM
Creation date
10/18/2013 2:50:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 City's website at www.cityofroseville.com /projects, and as detailed in the staff <br />35 report dated September 24, 2013. <br />36 <br />37 Discussion included member observation of the water pipe lining process and <br />38 problems encountered with this new technology, causing staff to recommend <br />39 deletion of the Transit Avenue segment due to continual delays in this first <br />40 portion of the project scope; Mr. Schwartz' review of the problem areas and <br />41 issues to be addressed with this type of application as it evolves, and long -term <br />42 warranty (15 years for the entire pipe) for full replacement for the work done to- <br />43 date that exceeds the typical one -year contractor warranty; and potential for the <br />44 product in the future as these trial applications are evaluated. <br />45 <br />72 Member Felice called to the PWETC's attention a missing piece of the pathway <br />73 plan previously identified: Fairview Avenue from County Road B -2 to County <br />74 Road C, with a bus stop in the middle of that segment on the west side of <br />75 Fairview Avenue, currently without a sidewalk to it and no appropriate crosswalk. <br />76 Member Felice noted that this area provided access to a number of businesses, but <br />77 was currently very difficult to cross. Member Felice asked that this segment be <br />78 included in the ranking as a high priority, as she had observed that the Fairview <br />79 trail was used quite heavily. <br />Page 2 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.