Laserfiche WebLink
The total citywide value of the discounts is approximately $290,000 annually. This represents the <br />amount of water and sewer charges that are shifted from households that get the discount to those that <br />don't. <br />To put this in a different context, if the senior discount program was eliminated, the standard fee would <br />be reduced as follows: <br />Standard <br />Amount <br />Discount <br />Amount <br />Difference <br />% Diff. <br />Water Base Fee (per quarter) <br />$ 49.50 <br />$ 32.15 <br />$ 17.35 <br />Sanitary Sewer Base Fee tr. <br />37.35 <br />23.30 <br />14.05 <br />Total <br />$ 86.85 <br />$ 55.45 <br />$ 31.40 <br />-36% <br />The total citywide value of the discounts is approximately $290,000 annually. This represents the <br />amount of water and sewer charges that are shifted from households that get the discount to those that <br />don't. <br />To put this in a different context, if the senior discount program was eliminated, the standard fee would <br />be reduced as follows: <br />Discussion Issues <br />In evaluating the relevance of any existing public assistance program, it's important to reflect upon <br />why the program was created in the first place and whether those objectives have been met. In this <br />particular case, the Program was created to achieve a specific outcome — to encourage homeowners to <br />connect to the municipal system. Clearly this primary objective was achieved long ago. <br />This raises the question as to what the Program's current objectives are. Intuitively one could surmise <br />that one of the remaining objectives is to provide assistance to those that have limited financial means. <br />However, the Program does not feature any means testing. Recipients merely have to sign an affidavit <br />signifying that they're drawing social security or are at or below federal poverty guidelines. Currently, <br />only a handful of homeowners are receiving the discount because they are below the federal poverty <br />guidelines. <br />This discussion has taken place at the Council level on several occasions in the past decade. Each <br />time, the Council has taken no action. Given the significant financial shift that is occurring, the <br />Council is advised to carefully consider whether the Program's objectives are still relevant. That <br />consideration should be made with the understanding that the number of recipients in the Program is <br />expected to steadily expand over the next 10 years under current eligibility criteria <br />This expansion will make it financially advantageous for older homeowners, while simultaneously <br />making it financially more difficult for younger ones. <br />12 <br />Standard <br />Amount <br />Revised <br />Amount <br />Difference <br />% Diff. <br />Water Base Fee (per quarter) <br />$ 49.50 <br />$ 45.50 <br />$ 4.00 <br />Sanitary Sewer Base Fee tr. <br />37.35 <br />34.20 <br />3.15 <br />Total <br />$ 86.85 <br />$ 79.70 <br />$ 7.15 <br />- 8% <br />Discussion Issues <br />In evaluating the relevance of any existing public assistance program, it's important to reflect upon <br />why the program was created in the first place and whether those objectives have been met. In this <br />particular case, the Program was created to achieve a specific outcome — to encourage homeowners to <br />connect to the municipal system. Clearly this primary objective was achieved long ago. <br />This raises the question as to what the Program's current objectives are. Intuitively one could surmise <br />that one of the remaining objectives is to provide assistance to those that have limited financial means. <br />However, the Program does not feature any means testing. Recipients merely have to sign an affidavit <br />signifying that they're drawing social security or are at or below federal poverty guidelines. Currently, <br />only a handful of homeowners are receiving the discount because they are below the federal poverty <br />guidelines. <br />This discussion has taken place at the Council level on several occasions in the past decade. Each <br />time, the Council has taken no action. Given the significant financial shift that is occurring, the <br />Council is advised to carefully consider whether the Program's objectives are still relevant. That <br />consideration should be made with the understanding that the number of recipients in the Program is <br />expected to steadily expand over the next 10 years under current eligibility criteria <br />This expansion will make it financially advantageous for older homeowners, while simultaneously <br />making it financially more difficult for younger ones. <br />12 <br />