Laserfiche WebLink
260 <br />Member Stenlund offered to provide services for a Capstone monitoring project to <br />261 <br />determine the usage and prove people were using the painted strip versus the off - <br />262 <br />road pathway over a period of time. <br />263 <br />264 <br />In his ranking rationale, Member Gjerdingen noted that he had assumed that not <br />265 <br />all projects would be done in tandem; and if options or segments were <br />266 <br />consolidated, he would still rank the Alta Vista Drive (Map #34 — Alta Vista <br />267 <br />Drive ) and the Pineview Court segment on Dale Street similarly with a "Y' <br />268 <br />269 <br />Member Felice noted that she had ranked Alta Vista as a "1" and she would also <br />270 <br />consider this as a "1" if a connection all the way on Alta Vista was attained. <br />271 <br />Member Felice opined that there needed to be a pathway to somehow completely <br />272 <br />traverse down Dale Street; and she found this preferable to one on -road. <br />273 <br />274 <br />Member Stenlund opined that the City Council may take the PWETC's <br />275 <br />recommendations to fund the top ten from this list with funds they have available; <br />276 <br />or they may choose to perform their own ranking. Member Stenlund suggested <br />277 <br />that the PWETC recommend anything over 2.18 for the highest pr' ity to be <br />278 <br />considered the first year of the pathway build -out plan. <br />PAW, <br />Page 7 of 19 <br />