Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 28th day of August 2000, at 6:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Wiski, Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke & Kysylyczyn <br />and the following were absent: none. <br /> <br />Council Member Mastel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9808 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO <br />SECTION 703.04B2 AND B9 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE <br />FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 201 MCCARRON'S STREET (PF3228) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Ralph Jenson has requested a variance to allow paving a driveway on the <br />west side of his parcel; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B2 states: Minimum Distance: The minimum distance <br />between edges of driveways at the front property line right-of-way line shall be 10 feet except in <br />planned unit developments where the development agreement shall specify the distance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B9, Driveways on Private Property: Residential driveways, <br />shall be constructed so that the edge of the driveway nearest the side lot line shall be a minimum <br />of five feet from the side lot line; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the property at 201 McCarron's Street has an existing street access, gravel <br />drive and detached two stall garage (rear of parcel); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission, on August 9, 2000, held the public <br />hearing regarding the Ralph Jensen request and found hardships to exist and recommended (5-0) <br />to approve the variance based on the following findings: <br /> <br />WHEREAS, there is a physical hardship in denying the applicant a variance to <br />construct a paved surface for the driveway at 201 McCarrons Street, that hardship being <br />the difficulty in accessing the parking structure in the rear of the property without a paved <br />surface; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the necessity of using the parking structure in the rear of the property <br />is the result of a physical hardship, that hardship being the applicant's physical condition <br />requiring the use of a specially equipped vehicle and the inability of the attached garage <br /> <br />1 <br />