My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2013 2:47:09 PM
Creation date
10/24/2013 2:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/24/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Map #21 —Rice Street/County Roads C-2 to D <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that the composite rankings were reasonable close; with <br /> Member DeBenedet opining that this result may be from his fine-tuning of his <br /> individual rankings based on his perception of instructions at the last PWETC <br /> meeting. <br /> Map #5 - County Road C Sidewalk(Western Avenue to Rice Street) <br /> Mr. Schwartz questioned if it was appropriate to rank this higher than a segment <br /> that has no pathway or sidewalk whatsoever. <br /> Member Gjerdingen opined that this segment proves that, using the County Road <br /> D west of Cleveland segment as an example, which had a pretty low ranking, but <br /> this segment was ranked higher than that. Member Gjerdingen opined that he <br /> thought this segment from Western to Rice was important. <br /> Member Stenlund noted his ranking rationale in not rank it higher if another <br /> option across the road was already available for any particular segment. <br /> Member DeBenedet noted that he failed to follow his own rationale for this <br /> segment to remain consistent with his similar comments on the Lexington Avenue <br /> pathway already existing on one side. <br /> Member Felice opined that the distinction should be based on how busy the <br /> roadway was. <br /> Member Stenlund observed that there were four potential stops on that segment; <br /> including other issues, such as not much of a refuge on the school side at all. <br /> Member Gjerdingen stated that he had observed considerable pedestrian use on <br /> that segment; and expressed hope that it would be addressed as part of the Rice <br /> Street reconstruction, and recommended that ranking remain as is, with consensus <br /> of the body. <br /> Member DeBenedet opined that he should have ranked that segment differently, <br /> but suggested staff return with a revised spreadsheet and composite ranking at the <br /> next PWETC meeting based on tonight's discussion, including all columns. <br /> Map #11 -Fairview Avenue (North of County Road B2) <br /> Member Felice noted that she ranked the County Road C and County Road D <br /> segments as a"1;" and asked that the PWETC discuss their rankings further. <br /> Member Gjerdingen stated that he would rank it higher than the County Road C-2 <br /> to D segment. <br /> Page 10 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.