My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-09-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2013 2:47:09 PM
Creation date
10/24/2013 2:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/24/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion ensued regarding options available with existing street widths for the <br /> segment of Rice Street project south from County Road B to Larpenteur Avenue, <br /> with Mr. Schwartz clarifying that while it is considered a newly reconstruction <br /> path, that segment of Rice Street would be out seven years for reconstruction. <br /> While recognizing Member Stenlund's comments about safety along the Rice <br /> Street corridor, Member DeBenedet opined that he had no conflicts with the <br /> current ranking. <br /> Map #4 - County Road C on- road (Lexington Avenue to Rice Street) <br /> Discussion included the considerable amount of maintenance to keep the pathway <br /> trimmed; erosion of existing pavement, with Mr. Schwartz advising that the City <br /> had been replacing that piece that had deteriorated with the fence sliding down the <br /> hill, but now the sidewalk had been widened and the embankment area better <br /> maintained. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that Ramsey County had committed to changing that <br /> section to a 3 lane design; and if so, Member Stenlund noted that his ranking <br /> should then change accordingly, to avoid a 4 lane design and make something <br /> work on-road. <br /> Since on-road striping was a minimal cost, Member DeBenedet suggested that it <br /> be designated in a different category other than as a capital improvement; noting <br /> that they were also often part of a reconstruction discussion with Ramsey County <br /> on road within their jurisdiction. <br /> Member Stenlund opined that some striping was valuable and made people make <br /> the connections, and it would become a habit after repeated use. At the request of <br /> Member Stenlund, Mr. Schwartz advised that latex striping typically lasted two <br /> years depending on traffic, and epoxy had a five-year life span. If the striping <br /> was recessed, Mr. Schwartz advised that it lasted even longer as it avoided <br /> damage by plows; however, he noted there was a considerable difference in costs. <br /> Map #5 —Acorn Park Pedestrian Crossing <br /> Member DeBenedet noted that this segment needed more discussion between City <br /> and Ramsey County staff <br /> Map #20 —Dale Street Option 2 off-road) <br /> Member DeBenedet noted that this segment had been eliminated previously. <br /> Victoria Street <br /> Member DeBenedet noted that these segments were better identified as Millwood <br /> and Chatsworth rather than Victoria Street; and given their low traffic counts and <br /> speeds, opined that they didn't even qualify for striping. However, it was the <br /> consensus to leave them listed on the spreadsheet, as they wouldn't serve to delay <br /> another off-road pathway project. <br /> Page 9 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.