My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1014
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2013 8:37:24 AM
Creation date
10/29/2013 8:37:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 14,2013 <br /> Page 10 <br /> City plowed all residential sidewalks, unlike the Cities of Minneapolis and St. <br /> Paul where residents were responsible for doing so. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Schwartz advised that most <br /> sidewalk machines require a minimum of 5' clearance. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Schwartz advised that pervious <br /> surfaces had not been tried for the pathway itself, as permeable pavements were <br /> typically more expensive, and would therefore be used as a last resort unless that <br /> technology was deemed best for drainage. However, Mr. Schwartz noted that <br /> there were currently other less expensive means, such as infiltration tranches <br /> where water can be directed between the sidewalk or roadway. <br /> Ms. Giga advised that, in that situation, the City would over-excavate the area <br /> with engineered soils allowing for infiltration, or install a "belt and suspenders" <br /> for the pipe to allow water in the stormwater system. Ms. Giga noted that the goal <br /> was to have water infiltration methods in place before it reached the storm sewer <br /> system; or at a minimum to delay and pre-treat it before it reached the system. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Schwartz clarified that the City <br /> did not pay the Metropolitan Council for volume or quality of storm water. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked that staff remain cognizant that, on the stretch of <br /> Victoria Street between County Road B and Lovell Avenue, if striping was the fi- <br /> nal decision, there was a fair amount of southbound traffic; and suggested that <br /> with the timing of the light, a situation not be created for traffic stacking if the fi- <br /> nal design was down to a single lane. <br /> Mr. Schwartz recognized that concern, and advised that when staff spoke with <br /> Ramsey County staff, they agreed to perform a study of the intersection. With the <br /> City's proposed 2014 project at Victoria Street south of County Road B, Mr. <br /> Schwartz noted that this may be an opportune time to upgrade the signal at that <br /> time. However, Mr. Schwartz noted that Ramsey County would study all aspects <br /> during the study, and identify turn lane and other issues. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, driving the Victoria Street corridor frequently, visibility <br /> was a concern at the crest of the bridge and connecting streets on either side of the <br /> bridge to allow their safe access into a turn lane. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that $2 million had been designated for pathways in available <br /> Park Renewal Bond funding, recognizing that this corridor could take a major <br /> portion of that funding. <br /> At the suggested preference of Mayor Roe, Mr. Schwartz advised that an option <br /> would be to supplement the cost from the Stormwater Fund for drainage im- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.