CC_Minutes_2013_1014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 14, 2013 Page 9 vidual property details: drainage improvements; tree replacement and other land- scaping; driveways as they relate to the drainage improvements; and retaining walls as applicable. This concluded staff's presentation as they addressed City Council questions prior to public comment. Councilmember McGehee questioned those areas with 8' wide pathways that were constricted and went all the way to the curb, opining that they were very un- attractive (e.g. Fairview from Roselawn to B-2); and suggested plantings or prai- rie plants that would be more aesthetically pleasing, such as those done by the City of Falcon Heights (e.g. Roselawn from Snelling to Hamline). Councilmem- ber McGehee also questioned the advantage of an infiltration trench and why that is preferred by the Watershed District rather than a ribbon curb and drainage to di- rect water into that instead of directly into the storm system. Mr. Schwartz responded that 6' was identified as a standard width for concrete in- stallations in the Pathway Master Plan; especially on County Road B-2 with its high traffic volumes and identified shoulders for on-street bikers, as existed today. In response to the plantings on Roselawn Avenue, Mr. Schwartz advised that this was done at the request of the City of Falcon Heights, and appeared to work well if draught tolerant plants were used, and could be a consideration with this project as well. However, Mr. Schwartz clarified that there concrete is curb on Roselawn Avenue, while there is not on this street, but simply more of an extension of the street itself. Mr. Schwartz advised that the main goal is to minimize that type of section on this segment due to safety concerns for elementary aged school chil- dren using the corridor. Councilmember McGehee opined that this should speak even more to providing a visible plant buffer and not allow the sidewalk so close to the street when there was no curb; further opining that she didn't understand the rationale for that safe- ty aspect at all. Mr. Schwartz responded that this was the intent; however, there were some chal- lenges with drainage,but where possible the sidewalk would be moved back. Regarding the 6' width, Councilmember McGehee questioned if this was simply the standard width selected twenty (20) years ago when the original Pathway Master Plan was done; and how that width compared to surrounding communities. Mr. Schwartz advised that width varied; however, he noted that one thing driving it and not part of the Master Plan, was due to the width of the machines used to clear sidewalks during the winter months without damaging curbs or turf, with that primary standard width being 6'. Mr. Schwartz clarified that in Roseville,the