My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1014
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2013 8:37:24 AM
Creation date
10/29/2013 8:37:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 14, 2013 <br /> Page 8 <br /> proximity of the project; and recommendations for each segment. Those seg- <br /> ments included: County Road B-2 Lexington Avenue to Rice Street (north side of <br /> the street); Victoria Street to County Road B-2 to Central Park (east side of the <br /> street); Victoria Street to County Road B-2 to Central Park (east side of the street <br /> or west side of the street); and Victoria Street to Central Park to County Road C. <br /> Ms. Giga noted the comments and feedback — both for and against — received at <br /> various informational meetings and on-site visits with property owners to-date. <br /> As detailed in the RCA, Ms. Giga noted most design concerns were related to <br /> drainage, trees and landscaping, retaining walls, and driveways, specific to drain- <br /> age issues. <br /> Ms. Giga noted that a major part of the project involved addressing existing <br /> drainage issues and engineering designs to provide significant piping, structures, <br /> and grading to alleviate or mitigate those issues. <br /> Regarding tree preservation, Ms. Giga advised that staff continued to work with <br /> the City's Forester to minimize impact to healthy trees and identify those that <br /> were not as healthy and may require replacement in the near future whether or not <br /> they were removed as part of this project. Ms. Giga noted that staff would con- <br /> tinue to work with individual residents throughout the design process, especially <br /> in those areas of significant impact. <br /> Ms. Giga advised that, part of the final design aspects of the project would be <br /> where retaining wall specifics would be addressed, as well as other design aspects <br /> and area aesthetics. <br /> Ms. Giga reviewed estimated construction costs—per segment and estimated con- <br /> struction costs for each segment as detailed in the RCA, noting that additional <br /> consulting engineer assistance would be required to work through various drain- <br /> age issues and watershed requirements. <br /> If the City Council authorizes proceeding with a Feasibility Study, Ms. Giga re- <br /> viewed the proposed project schedule, with October 2013 through January 2014 <br /> for final design; January/February of 2014 advertising for bids; award of bids in <br /> March of 2014; and actual construction in May through October of 2014. Ms. <br /> Giga advised that the construction timeline would also require phasing work <br /> around transportation needs and key dates for the School District (e.g., last and <br /> first day of school); Rosefest; Minnesota State Fair and Back to the Fifties events; <br /> and other considerations. <br /> As part of the multi-faceted final design process, Ms. Giga advised that this would <br /> require continued coordination with various agencies, including Ramsey County <br /> for cost-share and signal light upgrades or replacements at several intersections; <br /> Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District for storm water permits to meet <br /> their requirements; private utility relocations (phone and power pedestals); indi- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.