Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2013 <br /> Page 25 <br /> tween the first and second half of 2012 about another 1%. Mayor Roe reiterated <br /> that all that had been accomplished in October of 2013 was to "catch-up" to that <br /> point beyond 2012; and now under the new policy, the City was looking forward <br /> at what percentage to move toward based on that and the CPI, using that policy <br /> for 2014, and staff's recommendation for a 2% COLA. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated that Mayor Roe's perspective as stated was also his <br /> understanding; and questioned the accuracy of Councilmember Laliberte's com- <br /> ments that a 1% and 2% COLA had been approved in the last two calendar years. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted that the Compensation Study went back ten years to <br /> the last study, and addressed any "catch-up" and this assumption was based on <br /> fresh money for 2014. <br /> Finance Director Miler advised that Councilmember Laliberte's comments were <br /> accurate, exclusive of the 3.26% one-time adjustment. Mr. Miller concurred that <br /> this was a new assumption for 2014 and not applicable to the "catch-up" action <br /> recently taken. <br /> Interim City Manager Trudgeon clarified that staff did not keep bringing this issue <br /> back, but their action was simply based on the City Council discussions direction <br /> given to staff to-date. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the policy adopted was to be used <br /> for future years in determining COLA as part of the budget process. Mr. Trudg- <br /> eon stated that, if the City Council had said "no COLA" with Preliminary Budget <br /> adoption on September 9, 2013, it would have the end of the discussion. Howev- <br /> er, Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff was simply following City Council direction. <br /> With adjustments made to-date, Mr. Trudgeon opined that that was a market ad- <br /> justment, not COLA based on the Compensation Study indicating that the City <br /> was 4.6% below average of peer communities; and after considerable discussion, <br /> approving a 3.26% "catch-up" allotment to bring the City within the 90th percen- <br /> tile of that average to correct that past allotment. <br /> As Interim City Manager, Mr. Trudgeon advised that it was up to him not to grant <br /> employee raises just to be nice, but to look out for the overall health of the organ- <br /> ization in recruiting, retaining and succession planning of its employee resource. <br /> While not at the top of cities and their pay structures, Mr. Trudgeon noted that the <br /> adjustment now brought the City within competition range; and his charge was to <br /> keep the City competitive, thus the previous discussions and recommendations for <br /> the 2% COLA to avoid the City and its employees from falling behind again. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that another aspect of his consideration as Interim City <br /> Manager was in making sure that the City continued to adhere to the State's Pay <br /> Equity regulations ensuring equitable pay for genders and represented and non- <br /> represented employees. When an organization was faced with many male- <br />