Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2013 <br /> Page 26 <br /> dominated positions and different classes of employees getting different increases, <br /> Mr. Trudgeon cautioned the need to remain aware of remaining in compliance. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that those were just two things to he needed to keep in mind <br /> as the Interim City Manager: keeping the organization healthy and making sure it <br /> was in compliance with State regulations for pay equity; opining that the further <br /> skewed the pay equity plan was, the more problems that would surface. <br /> In arriving at the proposed 2% COLA, Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the process used <br /> in developing this as part of his City Manager-recommended budget previously <br /> presented to the City Council and public; but noting whether the CPI measures <br /> were used or not were up to the City Council and their policy. While speculation <br /> could be part of that process looking forward, Mr. Trudgeon noted that without a <br /> clear picture of the future, and based on information currently available, those <br /> calculations indicated the 2% COLA recommendation. Mr. Trudgeon advised <br /> that staff research to-date had indicated most peer communities were projecting <br /> between 2% and 2.5%, with each city's budget limited by its own resources. Spe- <br /> cific to the City of Roseville, Mr. Trudgeon noted that their decision would also <br /> need to be based on the City Council's priorities; with staff recommending a 2% <br /> COLA to keep the City competitive, while recognizing the tough budget decisions <br /> before the City Council. However, Mr. Trudgeon sought to clarify staff's ra- <br /> tionale in making the original recommendation, and bringing this assumption <br /> forward based on previous City Council direction. <br /> Councilmember Willmus referenced another index, the Employment Cost Index <br /> for Local and State Government Workers, noting that had also been running flat at <br /> 1%; and opined that the City needed to be careful how it budgeted and allocated <br /> its funds; and questioned Mr. Miller on the percentage of the overall budget that <br /> was allotted to wages and salaries. <br /> Mr. Miller estimated 75%to 80%in tax-supported programs. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted the need to be cognizant regarding its choices; <br /> and if using a similar tool going forward, suggested that maybe the CPI wasn't the <br /> best or only tool to use. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that when referencing an index for policy decisions, the one <br /> index represented what others were paying and the other is based on cost of liv- <br /> ing; and not making an argument either way, Mayor Roe questioned if the cost of <br /> living index was keeping up with what was being paid. Mayor Roe suggested <br /> finding a composite for individual points of view, noting that it appeared that a <br /> majority of the City Council supported COLA,but the difficulty was in its context <br /> with other things. <br />