Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2013 <br /> Page 31 <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe to clarify his hesitation, Councilmember Willmus <br /> advised that he was hesitant to make a decision to add an additional index or to <br /> approve the proposed policy, without further research. <br /> Councilmember Etten advised that his thought in using the State and City Em- <br /> ployee measurement was in considering public and private sector positions when <br /> competing for expertise from the broader market beyond other cities or govern- <br /> ment agencies (e.g. Information Technology positions). Councilmember Etten <br /> questioned whether or not staying within only those indices that may trend lower, <br /> would put the City out of the market for those not necessarily giving thought to <br /> municipal employment at the time. Councilmember Etten opined that he didn't <br /> want to remove the City from the broader market in recruiting and retaining other <br /> candidates outside the public sector. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Etten, opining that his <br /> was an excellent point; and reiterated that since this had been Councilmember <br /> Willmus' suggestion in the first place, it served to eliminate any contentious per- <br /> ceptions from the Compensation Study, and provided a more accurate and <br /> straightforward approach. If done mid-year, Councilmember McGehee opined <br /> that it would provide an even more accurate number for the preliminary budget, <br /> and would be a workable, nonjudgmental way to proceed. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred with the comments of Mr. Miller that neither <br /> indices is typically used for this purpose; opining that this was her rationale in <br /> having both sets of data available for discussion versus basing policy on only one. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned the interest in having a policy that took them both into <br /> consideration or only mentioning one. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that both could be mentioned with merit, while <br /> not ruling out other indices that may weigh in. Councilmember Laliberte clarified <br /> that she was not seeking a position to use the lesser number, as that would be dis- <br /> ingenuous; however, she liked the idea for a timing factor rather than talking <br /> about it throughout the year. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that the mid-year idea provided a clear and accurate goal. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the ECI index would be helpful for refer- <br /> ence, but note that the CPI was published monthly, and not necessarily only Min- <br /> neapolis data, but a broad index that tracked closely; and suggested incorporating <br /> both into the proposed policy. <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, approving Compensation Policy language as <br /> recommended by staff and detailed in the RCA dated October 21, 2013 as fol- <br /> lows: <br />