My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1021
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2013 3:25:03 PM
Creation date
11/4/2013 3:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2013 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Chief Mathwig advised that it would be problematic for current staff to review <br /> that documentation and contact individual license holders every two years, opin- <br /> ing that good pet owners would continue to vaccinate their pets. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Chief Mathwig, opining that a pet <br /> owner would do whatever was necessary to protect their family and pets; and ex- <br /> pressed her happiness to see this return to veterinarians to establish that guideline. <br /> From personal experience, Councilmember McGehee noted that, even if an ani- <br /> mal was vaccinated, it did not necessarily preclude an issue with rabies under all <br /> circumstances. Councilmember McGehee expressed her agreement with the pro- <br /> posed changes. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Chief Mathwig confirmed that the <br /> guidelines established by the Minnesota Veterinarian Board had been referenced <br /> and consulted in making these recommended changes, and followed parallel to <br /> their conclusions. <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1453 (Attachment <br /> A) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Selected Text of Title Five, Chapter 501, <br /> Animal Control of the Roseville City Code." <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned the accuracy of portraying animals as being <br /> "over vaccinated;" as the rabies vaccine diminished over time; and reiterated his <br /> request to require those holding lifetime licenses to keep those records up-to-date. <br /> Councilmember Willmus further disagreed with the statement that the issue was <br /> related to "over vaccination;:" and opined that the City was doing a disservice to <br /> its residents if not keeping tabs on lifetime license holders. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred with Councilmember Willmus, opining that <br /> with lifetime licenses, there should be some onus or expectation that they be held <br /> responsible to keep up-to-date; with this recommended language removing that <br /> requirement and making monitoring difficult. <br /> Amendment <br /> Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, retaining the original code language of line <br /> 121 to require submission by lifetime license holders every two (2) years, proof of <br /> the animal's current rabies vaccination. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that, being familiar with veterinarian practices, <br /> she could not support the amendment, opining that a veterinarian had the best <br /> view on that, especially concerns with older pets and autoimmune diseases. <br /> Staff did not have available the percentage or a count of lifetime license holders in <br /> the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.