My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1021
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2013 3:25:03 PM
Creation date
11/4/2013 3:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2013 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Mayor Roe stated that in general, he could support either approach; opining that <br /> the proposed amendment added strength to the additional language to demonstrate <br /> proof of vaccination every two years; also speaking in support of the amendment. <br /> Roll Call (Amendment) <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; Willmus; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: McGehee. <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Roll Call (Motion as Amended) <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; Willmus; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: McGehee. <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Willmus moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance Summary No. 1453 <br /> (Attachment B) entitled, "An Ordinance Summary Amending Selected Text of <br /> Title Five, Chapter 501, Animal Control of the Roseville City Code." <br /> Roll Call (Super Majority) <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; Willmus; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Abstentions: McGehee. <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> b. Consider Ordinance Repealing City Code, Chapter 305 Regulating the Sale <br /> of Christmas Trees <br /> Finance Director Chris Miller briefly reviewed the recommendation for repealing <br /> this ordinance, as detailed in the RCA dated October 21, 2013. Mr. Miller noted <br /> that this action (Attachment A) would repeal an ordinance enacted in 1952 seek- <br /> ing regulatory response at that time, with the issue now governed in the City <br /> Code, Chapter 1011, providing a broader and all-encompassing regulation, negat- <br /> ing the need for a code specific to Christmas tree sales. <br /> Councilmember Willmus thanked staff for bringing this forward, referencing it <br /> being brought to the City Council's attention during discussions last fall. <br /> Laliberte moved, Etten seconded, enacting Ordinance No. 1454 entitled, "An Or- <br /> dinance Repealing City Code Chapter 305, Sale of Christmas Trees." <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; McGehee; Willmus; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> c. Consider Ordinance Amending City Code, Chapter 306,Tobacco Products <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.