Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Plan designation of "B", Business, and is located in Comprehensive Planning District No. 14; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday, September 13,2000, and recommended approval (6-0) of the variances <br />being requested based on the following: <br /> <br />Findings: <br /> <br />Whereas, the Planning Commission found that a strict application of the City Code would <br />work an unusual hardship on the applicant; and <br /> <br />Whereas, specifically, that the unique physical feature of the principal structure being <br />located so far west on the parcel that it prevents exit from the car wash without a variance; and <br /> <br />Whereas, the hardship was not created by the applicant; and <br /> <br />Whereas, granting of the variance will not significantly impact the health, safety or general <br />welfare of the community; and <br />Whereas, the variance is needed to allow sufficient safety turn radius for fuel trucks; and <br /> <br />Whereas, specifically, the unique physicalfeature of the limited size of the parcel of land <br />prevents the applicant from providing adequate ingress and egress to his business without a <br />variance. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, September 25, 2000 and made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The City has determined that the site has unique characteristics, few alternatives, and <br />pre-existing hardships that warrant granting a variance. Further, the conditional use <br />permit meets the necessary criteria to allow the renovation and expansion project <br />because it is properly zoned for auto service in an area where autos are the primarily <br />transportation mode; it can visually enhance the corner and the pre-existing <br />site/structure; and it will provide a more functional fuel/service car wash facility. <br /> <br />2. A strict application of the City Code would impose an unusual hardship on the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />3. The unique physical feature of the principal structure being located so far west on the <br />parcel that it prevents exit from the car wash without a variance. <br /> <br />4. The hardship was not created by the applicant. <br /> <br />5. Granting of the variance will not significantly impact the health, safety or general <br />welfare of the community. <br /> <br />2 <br />