My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-10-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-10-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
12/3/2013 3:14:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
circumstances, Member DeBenedet questioned the position of the neighborhood <br /> in recommending to the City Council a bond in 2014 for build-out in 2014. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg advised that he would need to consult with the SWARN <br /> Executive Committee before responding to that question. <br /> Member DeBenedet asked Mr. Grefenberg to do so and respond accordingly. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg reiterated that the neighborhood would like this segment higher <br /> on the priority list based on needs versus available funding; and built sooner <br /> rather than later. <br /> Mr. Schultz noted that there was currently no funding source identified for any of <br /> the segments listed in the draft rankings. <br /> Member DeBenedet thanked those attending tonight's meeting; and suggested <br /> that the PWETC take another look at its rankings to determine if a way could be <br /> found to reorder them to make everyone happy; even though the group was doing <br /> its best in addressing the needs of the overall community. <br /> Jerry Larson, St. Stephen Street <br /> In response to Chair Vanderwall's identification of 400 vehicles per day, Mr. <br /> Larson corrected that information as 1,500 vehicles per day on County Road; with <br /> that correction duly noted by the Chair. <br /> Mr. Larson addressed those walking along County Road B from Highway 280 to <br /> Cleveland Avenue, including elderly people; and noted the number of vehicles <br /> they would most likely encounter during that time during peak periods; and noted <br /> the limited pavement available outside the stripe and cars forcing people off the <br /> area as well, based on his personal experience. In his 32 years living there, the <br /> roadway was an arterial during most of that time, and whether or not there was a <br /> high volume of traffic, it was still dangerous and no off-road pathway was ever <br /> provided during that entire period of time. Mr. Larson opined that this history <br /> supported the neighborhood's concern in seeing no action, even though they had <br /> asked a number of times during those years; and clarified that the neighbors were <br /> not asking for a trail requiring acquisition of rights-of-way or paving; but opined <br /> that people would be happy with a painted extension of the shoulder. <br /> Mr. Larson opined that in his review of the numbers for drainage, he found those <br /> cost estimates to be bizarre. Mr. Larson stated that, as a group, they were fairly <br /> disappointed with the process; noting that over his 32 years in the neighborhood, <br /> there was still no park, and limited areas for walking safely. As of last April, Mr. <br /> Larson opined that the neighbors thought they'd been heard and were on the right <br /> track, anticipating resolution in the near future based on the Parks ranking of#7. <br /> Now, Mr. Larson observed, it had gone from a#7 to entirely off the table, and he <br /> was no longer optimistic that it was going to ever happen. <br /> Page 16 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.