Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Vanderwall again noted that the rankings of this body were entirely <br /> different that those used by the Parks group, and using different criteria and <br /> information based on individual and composite rationale in establishing their <br /> rankings. Chair Vanderwall noted that, when the PWETC had started this <br /> exercise, they had started with a blank sheet showing segments, with no previous <br /> ratings, costs, traffic, maps, and other information; with each Commissioner <br /> coming at their priorities from a different viewpoint. <br /> Mr. Larson opined that he found that troubling, as if using different criteria, the <br /> rankings were sure to reflect individual preferences. <br /> While this may be true, Chair Vanderwall noted that as a volunteer, private citizen <br /> committee working with different areas in the committee, the PWETC those <br /> individual experiences and expertise were part of the dynamic of the group in <br /> providing recommendations to the elected officials, the City Council. <br /> Mr. Larson opined that, while everyone may have different perspectives, the <br /> criteria employed in developing the ranking should be understood and similar. <br /> Mr. Larson stated that he had great respect for their time and work on behalf of <br /> the community, but in this case, he did not agree with the rankings. <br /> Shirley Friberg, 2130 Fairview Lane <br /> As a resident in this neighborhood since 1960, Ms. Friberg stated that she had <br /> spoken repeatedly to the City's Engineer and Public Works Director, and had also <br /> met with Ramsey County staff during that time. During those discussions, Ms. <br /> Friberg alluded to excuses she'd been given why a pathway could not be <br /> constructed along County Road B or in that segment (e.g. not enough children in <br /> neighborhood to matter). Ms. Friberg reviewed several mishaps on the roadway; <br /> and her previous petition, which should be in the City's records, which had 150 <br /> signatures. Ms. Friberg referenced concerns she'd expressed about a lawsuit for <br /> the City or County; and subsequent white dividing line painted on by "the City" in <br /> response; and later patching by "the City" of portions of the roadway <br /> (approximately 12 years ago)that were in disrepair. Ms. Friberg opined that this <br /> still did not solve the problem of not having an area long the shoulder of the <br /> roadway to safely accommodate pedestrians. <br /> Ms. Friberg opined that the City had not been honest about a number of things, <br /> whether the Public Works, Engineering, or Police Departments. Ms. Friberg, as a <br /> medical reserve core volunteer and former nurse, expressed concern with <br /> emergency access from then neighborhood as well. Ms. Friberg opined that the <br /> City still had liability on that road; and suggested members of the PWETC <br /> attempt walking along it. Ms. Friberg further addressed the former pond that is <br /> now basically road runoff that was "green and smelly;" even though it had been <br /> trimmed after the neighborhood complained. <br /> Page 17 of 22 <br />