CC_Minutes_2013_1125 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,November 25, 2013 Page 24 For the express purpose of answering Councilmember McGehee's questions, Mayor Roe recognized the Larking Hoffman representative, Bill Griffith. Councilmember McGehee referenced Item 7, Tab 3, containing a transcript from an administrative hearing included in bound materials presented, and providing detail about the litigation brought by Total Wine & More in Florida. Prior to Mr. Griffith's response, Mayor Roe asked City Attorney Mark Gaughan if he would prefer to provide his feedback on any questions on material presented; or how best to do so, expressing concern that he saw this devolving into public testimony, which he had previously clarified was not going to take place. Mayor Roe asked City Attorney Gaughan if he preferred a process to directly address in- formation provided to the City Council. City Attorney Gaughan responded that, from his review of materials, and his in- terpretation of Tab 3 as referenced, he was not clear if the Larkin Hoffman repre- sentative or his firm had represented a party at the event or, with all due respect professionally speaking, whether that made that representative legally competent to provide an interpretation of the event. City Attorney Gaughan noted that, un- der those circumstances and limited exposure to the litigation, he would not find himself legally competent to address it either. Bill Griffith, Larkin Hoffman Law Firm, representing the Minnesota Li- censed Beverage Association Mr. Griffith stated that he could address those items of which he had direct knowledge, specifically the ongoing investigation in the City of Bloomington, MN; admitting that he had no direct knowledge of the Florida case. City Attorney Gaughan clarified that the document could speak for itself; specifi- cally an administrative action brought by Total Wine & More on its own against the State of Florida's licensing authorities, in which they sought clarification of state law; resulting from a final order from an administrative agency in Florida. As there was no one in the room tonight who was versed in Florida law to his knowledge, City Attorney Gaughan opined that his personal conclusion of what the rules and different actions in out-of-state action played related to the requested action before the City Council would be difficult to address. City Attorney Gaughan further opined that any conclusions on whether the existence of an ad- ministrative order or other order has any direct bearing on this item or the task be- fore the City Council. Mayor Roe concluded from City Attorney Gaughan his legal advice that the City Council had the information presented by Larkin Hoffman in their agenda packet; there was also a response in writing related to that information provided to the