My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_1202
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_1202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2013 10:47:49 AM
Creation date
12/16/2013 10:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/2/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 2, 2013 <br /> Page 21 <br /> ratively. Mr. Trudgeon suggested a meeting within the next six months, and not- <br /> ed that there may be impacts to the 2015 budget to create or reinvent programs <br /> and how to make them happen. In addressing this specific budget request, Mr. <br /> Trudgeon opined that it was relatively small in the overall budget scheme, but it <br /> was $4,000; and he offered to pass on tonight's comments, such as the involve- <br /> ment of other communities in funding, opining that they should be receptive to <br /> that idea. <br /> There was consensus on the council to support the additional $4,000 in funding <br /> for the 2014 budget, and to include it as part of the final budget decisions next <br /> week. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that there were other groups out there, with <br /> Mayor Roe referencing the faith community as well, who want to do things for <br /> seniors and suggested that they work together to make a bigger impact versus <br /> working separately. <br /> Fire Relief Association Funding <br /> Mr. Miller addressed current contributions and statutory obligations to the Fire <br /> Relief Fund, noting that the assumption was the need for $220,000. However, re- <br /> cent supplemental funding had been passed at the last legislative session, reducing <br /> that obligation further to approximately $20,000 versus $70,000. Mr. Miller pro- <br /> vided several options for the City Council to consider, and asked for their direc- <br /> tion. <br /> 1) Reduce the portion of the tax levy dedicated to funding the Fire Relief Asso- <br /> ciation; <br /> 2) Provide the Association with more money than statutory requirements dictate; <br /> or <br /> 3) Leave funding as is providing some contingencies for an additional $48,000 <br /> that the City no longer needed from taxpayer funding. <br /> As the City Council's representative to the Relief Association Board, Mayor Roe <br /> noted that the City is mandated to make up the gap between state funding and ac- <br /> tuarial requirements; and in the past the City had been required to add funding <br /> over budgeted amounts to cover that funding gap. However, Mayor Roe noted <br /> that, with new firefighters going into PERA versus the Fire Relief Association, <br /> they were now moving toward 100% funding and no longer requiring that gap <br /> funding. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Miller clarified that if extra funds <br /> were put in it could provide a cushion for future years to help those future budg- <br /> ets; however, he also noted that there was a potential risk that if investments for <br /> the fund did not do well, that additional money may just go by the wayside. From <br /> a staff perspective, Mr. Miller recommended that the City continue to fund ac- <br /> cording to statutes of the required amount and if additional funding was needed in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.