Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 2, 2013 <br /> Page 22 <br /> the future, the City re-evaluate long-term funding requirements of the City for the <br /> Fire Relief Fund. <br /> Councilmember Etten expressed interest in and advocated for using the $48,000 <br /> toward the General Levy before using reserves. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Mr. Miller confirmed that this sup- <br /> plemental funding had been received for 2013, and anticipated for 2014, subject <br /> to the State's biennial budget allotment by the state legislature. At the request of <br /> Councilmember Laliberte, Mr. Miller noted that this surplus had already been fac- <br /> tored into the $50,000 projected surplus; and was also a legally-restricted fund; <br /> however, it did save levy money going into it. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that his inclination was not to levy those dollars for 2014; and <br /> noted that the budget could always be increased; even though he anticipated it <br /> would be secure since the funding was part of the state's biennial budget. <br /> Merit Pay Status <br /> Mr. Miller clarified the $30,000 originally and tentatively earmarked for merit <br /> pay, as noted by Mr. Trudgeon that would return to the City Council at a later date <br /> for further review and discussion. From the last discussion, Mr. Miller noted that <br /> the City Council seemed amenable to a new merit pay program, but left $30,000 <br /> in contingency funds, which was still there (page 2 of the RCA). Mr. Miller <br /> sought to clarify that the City Council understood that this was not in the budget. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon concurred, noting that if and when the merit pay program was ap- <br /> proved by the City Council, with staff preparing for that discussion on December <br /> 9, 2013, whether or not approved, the appropriations would then be made accord- <br /> ingly. Given the timing on the calendar, Mr. Trudgeon wanted to make sure the <br /> ongoing discussion had sufficient time for decision-making and comfort levels. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that he continued to advocate for funding that from <br /> reserves as a one-time expenditure versus setting aside budget money going for- <br /> ward. <br /> Councilmembers Laliberte and McGehee concurred that this was a more transpar- <br /> ent method. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Trudgeon noted that this showed up in a line <br /> item annually; and he didn't' want to give the illusion that it was otherwise, even <br /> though funding should be part of the upcoming discussions. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her interest in hearing staff's presentation on <br /> this issue, since she had understood from previous discussions that the merit pay <br /> system was not favored by staff. <br />