Laserfiche WebLink
Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Roseville had total <br />long -term debt outstanding of $34,385,000. <br />In November, 2012 the City issued $17 million in general obligation debt to finance the <br />remaining construction of a new fire station and to make various park improvements. In <br />addition, the City also has long -term liabilities in the amount of $1,488,677 for <br />compensated absences and $564,044 for the net obligation for OPEB. <br />City of Roseville's Outstanding Debt - <br />General Obligation Improvement Bonds and Certificates of Indebtedness <br />General obligation <br />Improvement bonds <br />General obligation <br />Municipal bonds <br />Certificates of <br />Indebtedness <br />Total Outstanding Debt <br />Governmental Governmental Business -Type Business -Type <br />Activities Activities Activities Activities Total Total <br />2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 <br />$ 89000 $ 43500 $ - $ <br />17,175,000 32,150,000 - <br />2,07000 1,80000 - <br />$ 89000 $ 43500 <br />17,175,000 32,150,000 <br />2,07000 1,80000 <br />$ 20,13500 $ 34,38500 $ - $ - $ 20,13500 $ 34,38500 <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />Minnesota State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a city may issue to <br />3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $112,558,872. $32,795,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted against the <br />statutory limitation as the debt is wholly financed by a general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long -term debt can be found in Note 1- <br />D on page 50 of this report, and Note 4 -G on pages 60 -63. <br />Economic Factors and next year's Budgets and Rates <br />A number of local economic factors played a role in setting next year's Budget and utility <br />rates: <br />❖ The City made operational adjustments in recognition of declining interest <br />earnings and stagnant non -tax revenues. <br />❖ Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions and asset replacement needs. <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2013 budget. <br />24 <br />