res_9834 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WHEREAS, 492 Lovell Avenue will be legally described as: The North 175 feet of the west half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of section 12, Township 29 North, Range 23 West, except the West 100 feet thereof and except the East 2 acres of said West half, subject to Lovell Avenue over the North 30 feet thereof as per Document number 171354; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that minor subdivision to create two residential lots, both meeting the applicable R-l, Single Family Residential District requirements, for property located at 500 Roselawn Avenue be approved, subject to the following conditions: A. The proposed minor subdivision should provide afive-foot wide utility and drainage easement adjacent each property of both 500 and 492 Lovell Avenue. B. A detailed grading plan with the building slab or first floor elevation and drainage depicting directional flow must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to building permit issuance for 492 Lovell Avenue. C. The City policy is to accept parkland or cash in lieu of land dedication for the creation of new lots. In this case, cash will be accepted in lieu of parkland dedication. The dedication fee is $500.00for the newly created 492 Lovell Avenue parcel. Thefee will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit. D. The City policy is to accept a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) upon the issuance of a building permit. In this case, a SAC fee is required and will be collected upon the issuance of a building perm it for 492 Lovell Avenue. E. The City Engineer must review and approve the driveway access along Lovell Avenue prior to the issuance of a building permit. F. The applicant must record the two lot minor subdivision within 60 days after the approval of the City Council. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Mastel, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mastel, Goedeke, Maschka, Wiski and Kysylyczyn and the following voted against the same: None WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2