Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 9, 2013 <br /> Page 24 <br /> Etten moved, Willmus seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11114 (Attach- <br /> ment B) entitled, "Resolution Directing the County Auditor to Adjust the Ap- <br /> proved Tax Levy for 2014 Bonded Debt;" established in the amount of <br /> $85,330.67 <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Laliberte; Etten; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> As an internal housekeeping matter, Mayor Roe sought clarification from staff <br /> that the budgeted expenditures in the capital replacement funds were set equal to <br /> the tax levy revenue on purpose or at the actual 2014 CIP spending amounts. <br /> Finance Director Miller responded that historically, staff did expenditures to fund- <br /> ing sources on an annual basis, and as capital fluctuated, with vehicle and equip- <br /> ment needs, or Enterprise Funds also fluctuated annually, Generally Accepted <br /> Accounting Practices were used for the internal CIP, with the budget kept equal to <br /> revenues. <br /> From his personal perspective, Mayor Roe opined that it would be more transpar- <br /> ent for the public to show those figures as expenditures fluctuated. <br /> Roe moved, Etten seconded, to direct staff to indicate those figures in the budget, <br /> the actual anticipated 2014 costs for vehicles, buildings and capital replacement <br /> funds. <br /> Councilmember Etten recognized that staff concerns from a budgeting platform, <br /> with their desire to show things in a more orderly fashion, but opined that this re- <br /> quirement would show things more accurately or easier for the public to ascertain. <br /> Finance Director Miller noted that, at year-end, staff provided an actual, but for <br /> the CIP, there was no budget to actual; and from a staff perspective, they had not <br /> seen the value of having the budget fluctuate with the spending plan; when the fi- <br /> nancial reporting statements did not show it that way anyway. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Miller reviewed the rationale in not <br /> providing a spending plan, as it was always subject to revisions until finalized at <br /> the beginning of the next fiscal year. If the purpose of adopting the budget is to <br /> state, "Here is our spending plan," Mr. Miller questioned the relevancy of show- <br /> ing an amortized amount or actual amount. While indifferent to either way, Mr. <br /> Miller noted that in financial statement preparation, actual are shown, but there <br /> was no requirement to show spending without budget amounts. However, Mr. <br /> Miller advised that he was open either way to report it at the City Council's di- <br /> rective. <br />