2013-11-07_PR_Comm Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

system, maintaining an iconic design element but reworking the structures to provide increased lighting and improved amenities and imagery. The Design Team will also carry over the design element from the truss system to the CP Lexington Restroom Building to continue the imagery and visually connect Central park facilities. McILwain reoriented the Commission to the design process through a written memo outlining; • Building Planning – Key Concepts • Image/Style of Buildings and Roseville Parks • Building Form and Imagery Concepts McILwain talked about how the enclosed building designs create a very identifiable Roseville style so that structures across the community are easily identified. The buildings will not look exactly the same; the buildings are designed for a specific site. Locations are aligned with park connections, surround natural amenities and park features. Each building includes a large bay element that serves as a beacon to the community. The design helps make a bigger impact with a smaller structure through the roofline which provides for meeting room volume (as an example). High glass provides an open and airy feel. 50% Plans for Villa, Sandcastle and Oasis Parks were shared. These buildings are designed to accommodate 30 people at tables, approximately 50 people standup reception style. The main gathering areas will be multi-use and serve as ice rink warming space during the winter months. 50% plans for Autumn Grove Park and 90% plans for Lexington Park were presented. McILwain talked to the Commission about the orientation of the buildings and the reasoning for facility layout. Lexington and Autumn Grove buildings are 2200 sq. ft. with the gathering room coming in at 900 Sq. ft., these buildings have a separate warming room that will be used for youth programs during the non-ice seasons. An electronic sketch-up of Lexington Park was shared to give Commissioners a more dynamic view of the building and its internal and external components. Brokke explained that there were no designs for the Rosebrook site because of possible consideration for use of the Press Gym site. Brokke also reminded the Commission that the 50% designs may still need some adjustments. Evenson reviewed and updated the Commission on the Contractor Request for Proposal (RFP’s) process. • Proposal packages are nearly 100% complete • ASU will be presenting Best Value materials at a November 14 meeting for contractors • RFP will be released mid January Evenson briefed the Commission on recent NRATS efforts; • Natural Resource projects are focused on those with high potential for success