Laserfiche WebLink
401 <br />402 <br />403 <br />404 <br />405 <br />406 <br />407 <br />408 <br />409 <br />410 <br />411 <br />412 <br />413 <br />414 <br />415 <br />416 <br />417 <br />418 <br />419 <br />420 <br />421 <br />422 <br />423 <br />424 <br />425 <br />426 <br />427 <br />428 <br />429 <br />430 <br />431 <br />432 <br />433 <br />434 <br />435 <br />436 <br />437 <br />438 <br />Member Felice questioned if a road was reconstructed, wouldn't an agreement <br />exist for it to include a pathway. <br />Mr. Schwartz responded that this County Road B segment had already been part <br />of the original Pathway Master Plan for a number of years. <br />Member Felice opined that this should provide a stronger case for Ramsey <br />County's consideration. <br />segments. <br />IW -qWk, <br />439 <br />Member DeBenedet concurred, noting that it certainly made the PWETC's list. <br />440 <br />Member DeBenedet further noted that when Ramsey County reconstructs Long <br />441 <br />Lake Road, an outside funding source option to leverage funds to complete the <br />442 <br />project would be available and allow for some flexibility. Member DeBenedet <br />443 <br />opined that, once the Parks Renewal Program received and considered this final <br />444 <br />recommendation and list of the PWETC, they may reconsider their initial <br />445 <br />priorities, and with both lists provided to the City Council, the City Council could <br />446 <br />then take advantage of both in making their final decisions. <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />