Laserfiche WebLink
:' / <br />448 <br />Member Felice questioned if the Park Renewal Program funding was exclusive <br />449 <br />for pathways leading and connecting to parks. <br />450 <br />that overall averaging and provide good guidance to the City Council going <br />451 <br />Chair Vanderwall refocused discussion again on the PWETC charge, not <br />452 <br />reflections on the Parks pathway priority list. Chair Vanderwall noted that the <br />453 <br />NRATS would take this PWETC final recommendation to their Pathway <br />454 <br />Committee ranking and merge them together for the bucket projects for review by <br />455 <br />the City Council as an option for those funds, with the NRATS determining those <br />456 <br />areas of consensus. <br />457 <br />A& <br />458 <br />Member DeBenedet expressed his confidence in the PWETC's priority ranking <br />459 <br />for the Pathway Master Build -out Plan as revised ton i ht for Map #7 (County <br />460 <br />Road B segment). <br />461 <br />469 <br />Chair Vanderwall spoke to the benefit of this body in providing a diversity of <br />470 <br />interpretation and ranking consideration, opining that it would be beneficial in <br />471 <br />that overall averaging and provide good guidance to the City Council going <br />472 <br />forward. <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />