My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1992 Precinct Boundary Change Information
Roseville
>
Elections
>
Precinct Information
>
1992 Precinct Boundary Change Information
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 10:14:39 AM
Creation date
5/23/2007 4:25:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Elections
Elections - Document Type
Precinct Map ELE 00900
Date of Election
1/1/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />inf irmi ties also violate the equality of representation requirement <br />. of the fourteenth amendment to the United states constitution. The <br />panel denied plaintiff's motion to enforce Chapter 246, together <br />with its "curative amendments", as the reapportionment plan for the <br /> <br />state of Minnesota. <br /> <br />Because no party submitted specific <br /> <br />allegations of voting Rights Act violations, the panel ordered <br />submission of any Chapter 246 violations of the Federal Voting <br />Rights Act without waiver of juriSdictional objections by <br />October 7, 1991. <br />16. On October 7, 1991, defendant-intervenors, the Minnesota <br />LegiSlature, renewed ita submission of Chapter 246 together with <br />the curative amendments adopted by the Senate and House Committees <br />on Redistricting; plaintiffs proposed adoption of the legislature's <br />plan, with curative amendments, as the court-ordered legis~ative <br />redistricting plan; defendant Secretary of State Growe supported <br />the submission of the legislature; defendant Hennepin County <br />Auditor supported the submission of the legislature; and plaintiff- <br />intervenors submitted a proposed legislative redistricting plan. <br />The panel received additional submissions from citizens groups and <br />individual legislators, only one of which was made part of the <br />record. <br /> <br />17. No violations of the Federal Voting Rights Act were <br /> <br />asserted. <br /> <br />- <br />18. On October 15, 1991, defendant-intervenors submitted a <br />written response to the plaintiff-intervenors' proposed legislative <br />redistricting plan. On October 16, defendant Growe submitted a <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.