My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1992 Precinct Boundary Change Information
Roseville
>
Elections
>
Precinct Information
>
1992 Precinct Boundary Change Information
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 10:14:39 AM
Creation date
5/23/2007 4:25:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Elections
Elections - Document Type
Precinct Map ELE 00900
Date of Election
1/1/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chapter 246. <br /> <br />The amendments had passed out of the special <br /> <br />redistricting committees of both houses on August 26, 1991, after <br />the legislature had adjourned. However, the amendments had not <br />been passed by the full bodies of either house, nor had they been <br />presented to the governor for his signature. The panel declined to <br />adopt as a criterion the legislative committees' proposed <br />corrections to Chapter 246. <br />14. The August 29, 1991 Pretrial Order No. 3 also ordered <br />suspension, until further order of the panel, of the time periods <br />wi thin which local units of government are required to complete the <br />redefining of the boundaries of election precincts, wards, or other <br />local election districts pursuant to Minn. stat. 55 2048.135, <br />2048.14, 205.84, 205A.12, and 375.02 (Supp. 1991). The pretrial <br />order designated the format for submission of redistricting.plans <br />and directed oral argument on various motions, including whether <br /> <br />I <br />Chapter 246 violates the Minnesota or United states Constitutions <br />or the Federal Voting Rights Act. Finally, recOC)ftizing that the <br />time requirements for congressional redistricting are less <br />stringent, the panel deferred submission of congressional <br />redistricting plans. <br />15. FOllowing submissions from the parties, the panel issued <br />Pretrial Order NO.4, on October 1, 1991, which (a) denied <br />plaintiff-intervenors' motion to stay this proceeding; (b) declared <br />that the numerous facial infirmities in Chapter 246, including <br />noncontiguous districts, violate Article IV, sections 2 and 3 of <br />the Minnesota Constitution; and (c) declared that facial <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.