My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0106
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 3:16:40 PM
Creation date
1/28/2014 3:16:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 06, 2014 <br /> Page 10 <br /> City Attorney Bartholdi advised that his office would be in discussion with the <br /> Ethics Commission. <br /> Chair Fjelstad advised that the Commission had also held conversations about <br /> how best to change the process if the complaint concerned the City Manager, City <br /> Council or Mayor; opining that the current process was not as clear as it could be. <br /> Chair Fjelstad advised that the Commission's intent was to ask Interim City Man- <br /> ager Trudgeon to set up another discussion about the process; and how to address <br /> dismissal or withdrawal of a case, since current language did not allow a case to <br /> be withdrawn or define a clear process to follow if doing so. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that this discussion made perfect sense given the withdrawal of <br /> the previous case. <br /> Councilmember Willmus concurred, opining that it made sense at that time, and <br /> still does. <br /> Vice Chair Lehman questioned how the City Council envisioned a process if the <br /> complaint was made against the entire City Council, since they were the ultimate <br /> decision-makers; and how the Ethics Commission should establish their discus- <br /> sions. <br /> Mayor Roe responded that, as part of the process, ethics investigations against <br /> elected officials or elected bodies, subsequently enforced by the body itself, with <br /> those being held to the standard are the actual deciders of the sanctions. Mayor <br /> Roe further noted that part of the reason may not be bad, with political ramifica- <br /> tions serving as the backstop for the process with elected officials, individual <br /> Councilmembers or the City Manager; but supported having further discussion. <br /> Councilmember Etten spoke in support of discussions tonight retaining more <br /> strength to the Ethics Commission with the current higher standard of proof ver- <br /> sus a reduced standard. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred, opining that if clear and convincing evi- <br /> dence standards were maintained, if provided less wiggle room for the group as a <br /> whole if it reaches that level. Having not been on the City Council that the time <br /> the previous formal complaint came forward, Councilmember Laliberte sought <br /> clarification on the final action, with Mayor Roe advising that the City Council <br /> took action to dismiss the complaint. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Vice Chair Lehman confirmed that, <br /> in hindsight, the process needed additional work from the perspective of the <br /> Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.