My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0127
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 10:36:06 AM
Creation date
2/11/2014 10:21:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/27/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 27, 2014 <br /> Page 11 <br /> to provide his notes and comments to staff before redrafting a subsequent ordi- <br /> nance. <br /> General Comments <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked that, when it came back as a future iteration, it <br /> include all commissions in this new format; and concurred with Mayor Roe that a <br /> briefer list of duties and a clean demarcation of duties was prudent for all com- <br /> missions. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that all commissions should be advertised together <br /> for clarity and proceeding forward in one direction; and suggested that it be put in <br /> place on February 10th when staff returned with revisions. However, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten suggested that applications for all commission, including the Fi- <br /> nance and Community Engagement Commissions, could be advertised on Febru- <br /> ary 1St as originally proposed by staff; with finalizations in duties and functions <br /> made after that advertisement. <br /> Finance Commission <br /> City Manager Trudgeon sought clarification on the number of members deter- <br /> mined for this commission. <br /> Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of seven members to allow sufficient <br /> membership as members resigned or rolled off; still allowing the commission to <br /> function with a broad enough perspective that the role of the commission was not <br /> diminished during the transition. <br /> General Comments <br /> Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of seven members for all commissions. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested, if all commissions were proposed at seven members, fur- <br /> ther discussion could ensue during ordinance consideration. <br /> Community Engagement Commission <br /> In referencing her notes, Councilmember Laliberte noted seven members, plus <br /> one youth member was indicated for this commission. <br /> Regarding duties and functions based on the discussion at the January 6th meeting, <br /> Mayor Roe noted his intent that the commission also be involved with the com- <br /> munity visioning process, with his language being: "...advise the City Council on <br /> development, documentation, publicity and periodic review; and serve as the <br /> steering committee for future updates to the visioning process." Mayor Roe sug- <br /> gested that this be included as he originally intended. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.