CC_Minutes_2014_0127 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,January 27, 2014 Page 9 Councilmember Willmus echoed many of Councilmember McGehee's comments, bearing in mind that this commission would be advisory to the City Council, and where those duties were stated otherwise, corrections needed to be made. Councilmember Etten concurred with the comments of Councilmember McGehee related to the Community Engagement Commission; that some of those duties went over the line of the function of an advisory commission. Finance Commission Councilmember Etten suggested the addition of another item in Section 207.04 Duties and Functions: "Reporting methods and communication to make yearly budgeting processes and documents more open and understandable for the pub- lic;" to encourage more transparency, with the intent for someone with a back- ground knowledge in finance to make the documents and process more easily un- derstood by the general public. Regarding the cost benefit analysis proposal of Councilmembers McGehee and Willmus, Councilmember Etten expressed some concern, questioning how the timing would work; and while he concurred that this should always be part of the evaluation and consideration of any proposal, he opined that it would take a lot of staff time and may be hard to task a commission to put every project under such scrutiny. General Comments Regarding the number of members being seven versus five, Councilmember Etten noted that the City Council majority had agreed with seven members for the PWETC, as well as seven members for the Community Engagement Commission to allow sufficient people to attend events. Councilmember Etten spoke in sup- port of seven members for each commission to round things out; however, from his perspective, he noted that Finance Commission had been proposed at five members based on the specificity due to the preferred professional background. Finance Commission Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of Councilmember Etten's addition of Item D to address clarity and transparency; and spoke in support of his recollec- tion of the number of members for each respective commission. Councilmember McGehee reiterated her interest in a cost benefit analysis, clarify- ing that she was not intending a formulaic form to plug in numbers, either by staff or the commission; but for major projects (e.g. Target or WalMart as examples), and a review of additional city services that would need to be provided Coun- cilmember McGehee opined that there were a lot of things that would be support- ed in the community that weren't necessarily on the plus side of the ledger, but may be needed for a well-rounded community; and this would be addressed with