Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Public Works, Environment and <br />Transportation Commission <br />Agenda Item <br />Date: February 25, 2014 Item No: 5 <br />Item Description: Review of County Road B Pathway Project <br />Background: <br />At the November 25th City Council meeting a number of residents from the County Road B <br />neighborhood, in the area between Hwy 280 and Cleveland Ave, spoke to the Council about the lack of a <br />safe pedestrian facility along County Road B and concerns regarding the existing speed limit. Staff <br />updated the Council on the status of the discussions with Ramsey County regarding the transfer of <br />jurisdiction of the roadway to the City of Roseville. Staff discussed the expected life of the existing <br />pavement with the Council as well. Staff also proposed an interim pedestrian facility on a widened <br />shoulder on the south side of the roadway as a shorter term solution to the neighborhood concerns. <br />Historically, County Road B once connected to Trunk Highway 280 prior to the fall of the 35W bridge. <br />As a part of the changes to TH 280 to increase capacity and improve safety along the highway, a cul -de- <br />sac was installed on County Road B which disconnected it from Highway 280. When that occurred, <br />traffic volumes greatly reduced on County Road B, but no other changes were made to the roadway to <br />reflect the new character and functional classification of this roadway. Staff met with Ramsey County <br />staff several times since the change occurred to discuss the future jurisdiction of this segment since it no <br />longer functions as a typical county road. Staff has not agreed on the terms of a jurisdictional transfer at <br />this time. Ramsey County staff has agreed to work with the city and MnDOT to lower the speed limit to <br />30 MPH. We believe this can be accomplished in the next few weeks. <br />Staff, at the direction of Council, recently held a Public Meeting to meet with the neighborhood in order <br />to discuss their concerns regarding traffic safety in this area and also to present a potential short term <br />alternative for an enhanced pedestrian pathway along County Road B. Prior to this meeting, the <br />neighborhood assembled on December 10th to discuss this issue as well as other concerns along County <br />Road B. After that meeting, a list of Requested Features and Considerations was presented to staff. At <br />the January 16th meeting, staff addressed each item and agreed to follow up on items that could be <br />addressed at that time. Attached is the list of Requested Features and the response from staff. <br />Proposed Interim Pedestrian Pathway <br />At the January 16th meeting, staff presented a proposal to create a pedestrian pathway along the south side <br />of County Road B by extending the shoulder. Staff also discussed possibly using RUMBLE STRIPS <br />along the white shoulder line to physically delineate the travel lane from the pathway. The residents <br />seemed open to this concept, but there would need to be more communication with the neighborhood <br />before agreeing to this due to the concerns of additional noise related to the rumble strips. Additional <br />treatments for delineation will be discussed with the neighborhood prior to opening the pathway. The <br />pathway will extend from Cleveland Ave west to the existing curb and gutter just east of the in place cul- <br />de -sac on the west end of County Road B. <br />In order to provide a clear area for pedestrians, parking would need to be prohibited along the south side <br />of County Road B. This could be an inconvenience for residents that have direct access to County Road <br />