CC_Minutes_2014_0210 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February 10, 2014 Page 29 Related specifically to Item "D," Councilmember Laliberte opined that this in- volved communication, transparency and tools for the public. Councilmember Laliberte noted that Item "E" was in error and intended for a different ordinance; and should be stricken. Items "F, G, and H" Councilmember McGehee questioned whether Item "F" belonged in the Finance Commission ordinance; opining that the role belonged to the City Council, as it related to salary compensation and spending levels, opining that this was too spe- cific, and not necessarily things a commission should be involved with annually. Councilmember Etten concurred with both of those points, opining that he didn't want a commission aiming for specific spending levels if their role was advisory, agreeing that the City Council was tasked with that role. Councilmember Etten agreed that Item "F" didn't need to be part of their task, since they were already tasked with a lot of work, and Finance Director Miller would need to spend con- siderable time keeping people informed without adding this detail. Councilmember Willmus opined that he had no problem with Councilmember Laliberte's proposed language. Councilmember Laliberte proposed to edit Item "C" language as she had previ- ously proposed (green type) as follows: C. "Recommend budget goals, including but not limited to local tax rate and tax levy targets, management of enterprise funds, and spending levels[." And supported-budgetsT"] The proposed revised language was approved by consensus. Councilmember McGehee advocated striking language in Item"F." Councilmember Laliberte provided her intent for including that language, noting that whenever staff presented the City Council with peer city comparisons, they were questioned on why a particular city or group of cities was used for that eval- uation; and further noted that those peer cities were not necessarily always the same across the board. However, Councilmember Laliberte noted that no one on the City Council seems to be willing to make recommendations on which cities should be used for peer comparisons. Councilmember Laliberte opined that, if the City was going to compare itself to other cities for utility rates or anything regard- ing financial matters, they needed to seriously consider identifying those peer communities seriously at a future City Council Worksession to make sure every- one was in agreement or to change the current process to provide a clear directive for staff.