My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0319_HRC_packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Agendas and packets
>
2014_0319_HRC_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 11:25:11 AM
Creation date
3/13/2014 3:46:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
362 <br />363 <br />364 <br />365 <br />Human Rights Commission Minutes <br />February 19, 2014 — Draft Minutes <br />Page 9 of 13 <br />Department determined the claims of op lice misconduct were unfounded and the investigation <br />was closed at the beginning of January. A letter was sent to the complainant and a response has <br />not been received. <br />366 Commissioner Grefenberg said that in the past the Human Ri�hts Commission had provided a <br />367 forum for com�laintants in situations such as this. He said that � if this matter were to <br />368 proceed further, he recommended the City Manager and the Police Chief discuss this issue at a <br />369 future HRC meeting, acknowled �i�ng that the Commission was not a�olice review �aneL He <br />3�o requested the HRC members be allowed to review the final resolution report. <br />371 <br />372 Ms. Collins stated she would make this request to the Police Chie£ She was uncertain e€ <br />373 whether this was public information. <br />374 <br />375 Vice Chair Becker stated the complainant had the opportunity to pursue this matter further with <br />3�6 the City Council and has not come forward to date. In addition, a complaint could be filed with <br />377 the State. He did not feel it was necessary for the complainant to come before the HRC, as this <br />37g was not an investigatory body. He believed that the Police Chief acted fairly given the alignment <br />379 of the witness testimony. <br />380 <br />3g1 Commissioner Courneya believed the role of the HRC was to be informed when the City <br />3g2 receives complaints. The proper action was taken and the Council was made aware of the <br />383 situation. She did not believe the HRC should advocate for either side, but instead should reach <br />384 out to ensure the matter was resolved on a proper manner. She stated if the same complaint were <br />3g5 made to the HRC, the complainant should be informed of the HRC's role within the City. <br />386 <br />387 Commissioner Grefenberg � spoke in favor of making the complainant aware of her rights <br />388 includina the o�portunity to go before the Council at the public comment forum. He suggested a <br />389 letter be sent to the complainant of these rights. <br />390 <br />391 <br />392 <br />393 <br />394 <br />395 <br />396 <br />Ms. Collins stated this would be seen as a farm of encouragement and could be perceived that <br />the HRC would be taking her side. <br />Commissioner Courneya cautioned the HRC from escalating this issue as the complainant was <br />not seeking any further outlets. <br />397 Commissioner Grefenberg � indicated for the record that the HRC was not taking sides, <br />39s as it did not have all of the information. He also expressed concern with a comment within both <br />399 the police report and the complainant's letter referring to "I am the Police Internal Affairs". He <br />40o commented that this s}�e�e seemed resonant � of a*�*�'�*�r������ totalitarian state ���'� <br />401 . <br />402 <br />403 <br />404 <br />405 <br />406 <br />Chair Groff suggested staff speak with the Police Chief to see if the final report was available for <br />the HRC to review and that this item be brought back to the Commission in March. <br />Future Agenda Items <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.