res_9874 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 26th day of March 2001, at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present: Klausing, Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke, and Kysylyczyn and the following were absent: None Councilmember Klausing introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 9874 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION FROM B, BUSINESS TO HD, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 197 COUNTY ROAD B-2 (PF #3293). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a public hearing held on March 14,2001, received a request from Samuel Cave & Associates for a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment and rezoning to develop an 18 unit market rate apartment complex on property located at 197 County Road B-2; and WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment requires a map designation change from B, Business to HD, High Density Residential and a rezoning (change in the zoning map designation) from B-2, Retail Business District to R-3A, Multi-Family Residence District; Three to Twenty Four Units; and WHEREAS, said property is legally described as: Lot 2, Block 2, Transit rd Addition, Roseville Minnesota (PID # 122923140076 WHEREAS, after the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended (4-2) denial of the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning, indicating support for a lower density residential development; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council at their meeting of March 26, 2001, was presented with the project report from the Roseville staff, a presentation by the developer, and took public comment on the application for comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning to allow the proposed 18 unit apartment complex; and WHEREAS, upon consideration of the staff and developer presentations and citizen comments the City Council voted (4-1) to approve the comprehensive land use amendment based on the following findings: A. The vacant parcel has limited ability to be developed given the pond, easements, and setbacks applicable to a specific zoning district.